Comparison of Face Washing and Face Wiping Methods for Trachoma Control: A Pilot Study

• Published in: The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene Vol. 102; no. 4; pp. 740 - 743
• Main Authors: Czerniewska, Alexandra, Versteeg, Aalbertus, Shafi, Oumer, Dumessa, Gebeyehu, Aga, Muluadam Abraham, Last, Anna, MacLeod, David, Sarah, Virginia, Dodson, Sarity, Negussu, Nebiyu, Sori, Birhanu Kenate, Kirumba, Michael, Biran, Adam, Cairncross, Sandy, Burton, Matthew J, Greenland, Katie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Institute of Tropical Medicine 01.04.2020; The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
• Subjects: Bacterial infections; Child; Child, Preschool; Comparative studies; Disease control; Disease prevention; Eyes & eyesight; Face; Humans; Hygiene; Infant; Pilot Projects; Soaps; Trachoma - prevention & control
• ISSN: 0002-9637; 1476-1645
• DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0726

Eye-to-eye transmission of , the causative agent of trachoma, may be plausibly interrupted if faces are kept free of ocular and nasal discharge. Between April and June 2018, 83 children aged 1-9 years with active trachoma were recruited from 62 households and allocated to a face cleaning protocol: face washing with water, face washing with water and soap, or face wiping. Faces were examined for the presence of ocular and nasal discharge, and swabs were taken from faces and hands to test for at baseline, immediately post protocol, and after 1, 2, and 4 hours (washing protocols). Washing with soap was more effective at removing ocular discharge than either washing with water (89% and 27% of discharge removed, respectively, = 0.003) or wiping with a hand (42%, = 0.013). The reduction in prevalence of ocular discharge was sustained for at least four hours. The prevalence of on face swabs was reduced by all washing protocols. The importance of soap should not be overlooked during facial cleanliness promotion.