Age-based norm-reference values for the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool

Background and objectives Differentiating problematic feeding from variations of typical behavior is a challenge for pediatric providers. The Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool (PediEAT) is a parent-report measure of symptoms of problematic feeding in children 6 months to 7 years old with evidence of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPediatric research Vol. 84; no. 2; pp. 233 - 239
Main Authors Pados, Britt F., Thoyre, Suzanne M., Park, Jinhee
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Nature Publishing Group US 01.08.2018
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and objectives Differentiating problematic feeding from variations of typical behavior is a challenge for pediatric providers. The Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool (PediEAT) is a parent-report measure of symptoms of problematic feeding in children 6 months to 7 years old with evidence of reliability and validity. This study aimed to determine age-based, norm-referenced values for the PediEAT. Methods Parents of children between 6 months and 7 years old ( n  = 1110) completed the PediEAT. Descriptive statistics were calculated for subscale and total scores of the PediEAT within 11 age groups. Results The PediEAT total scores followed a general downward trajectory with increasing age. Physiologic Symptoms were relatively steady from 6 to 15 months, and then rapidly declined in 15–18 month olds and continued to decline thereafter. Problematic Mealtime Behaviors increased from 6 to 9 months to a peak in 24–30 month olds and then declined with increasing age. Selective/Restrictive Eating increased from 6 to 9 months to a peak at 12–15 months and then decreased over time thereafter. Symptoms of difficulty with Oral Processing were highest in 6–9 month olds and decreased with age. Conclusions The PediEAT now has age-based norm-reference values to guide score interpretation and clinical decision-making.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0031-3998
1530-0447
DOI:10.1038/s41390-018-0067-z