Endogenous, non-reducing end glycosaminoglycan biomarkers are superior to internal disaccharide glycosaminoglycan biomarkers for newborn screening of mucopolysaccharidoses and GM1 gangliosidosis

Measurement of enzymatic activity in newborn dried blood spots (DBS) is the preferred first-tier method in newborn screening (NBS) for mucopolysaccharidoses (MPSs). Our previous publications on glycosaminoglycan (GAG) biomarker levels in DBS for mucopolysaccharidosis type 1 (MPS-I) and MPS-II demons...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMolecular genetics and metabolism Vol. 140; no. 1-2; p. 107632
Main Authors Herbst, Zackary M., Hong, Xinying, Urdaneta, Leslie, Klein, Terri, Waggoner, Christine, Liao, Hsuan-Chieh, Kubaski, Francyne, Giugliani, Roberto, Fuller, Maria, Gelb, Michael H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Measurement of enzymatic activity in newborn dried blood spots (DBS) is the preferred first-tier method in newborn screening (NBS) for mucopolysaccharidoses (MPSs). Our previous publications on glycosaminoglycan (GAG) biomarker levels in DBS for mucopolysaccharidosis type 1 (MPS-I) and MPS-II demonstrated that second-tier GAG biomarker analysis can dramatically reduce the false positive rate in NBS. In the present study, we evaluate two methods for measuring GAG biomarkers in seven MPS types and GM1 gangliosidosis. We obtained newborn DBS from patients with MPS-IIIA-D, -IVA, -VI, -VII, and GM1 gangliosidosis. These samples were analyzed via two GAG mass spectrometry methods: (1) The internal disaccharide biomarker method; (2) The endogenous non-reducing end (NRE) biomarker method. This study supports the use of second-tier GAG analysis of newborn DBS by the endogenous NRE biomarker method, as part of NBS to reduce the false positive rate.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Z.M.H., X.H., L.U., T.K., C.W., H.-C.L., F.K., R.G., and M.H.G.; Methodology, Z.M.H., X.H., M.F. and M.H.G.; Validation, Z.M.H. and X.H.; Formal Analysis, Z.M.H. and M.H.G.; Investigation, Z.M.H.; Resources, L.U., T.K., C.W., H.-C.L., F.K., R.G.; Data Curation, Z.M.H.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Z.M.H.; Writing—Review and Editing, H.-C.L., F.K., R.G., M.F. and M.H.G.; Visualization, Z.M.H.; Supervision, M.F. and M.H.G.; Project Administration, M.H.G.; Funding Acquisition, M.H.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
ISSN:1096-7192
1096-7206
1096-7206
DOI:10.1016/j.ymgme.2023.107632