Experimental Comparisons of Sparse Dictionary Learning and Independent Component Analysis for Brain Network Inference From fMRI Data

In this work, we conduct comprehensive comparisons between four variants of independent component analysis (ICA) methods and three variants of sparse dictionary learning (SDL) methods, both at the subject-level, by using synthesized fMRI data with ground-truth. Our results showed that ICA methods pe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on biomedical engineering Vol. 66; no. 1; pp. 289 - 299
Main Authors Zhang, Wei, Lv, Jinglei, Li, Xiang, Zhu, Dajiang, Jiang, Xi, Zhang, Shu, Zhao, Yu, Guo, Lei, Ye, Jieping, Hu, Dewen, Liu, Tianming
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States IEEE 01.01.2019
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0018-9294
1558-2531
1558-2531
DOI10.1109/TBME.2018.2831186

Cover

More Information
Summary:In this work, we conduct comprehensive comparisons between four variants of independent component analysis (ICA) methods and three variants of sparse dictionary learning (SDL) methods, both at the subject-level, by using synthesized fMRI data with ground-truth. Our results showed that ICA methods perform very well and slightly better than SDL methods when functional networks' spatial overlaps are minor, but ICA methods have difficulty in differentiating functional networks with moderate or significant spatial overlaps. In contrast, the SDL algorithms perform consistently well no matter how functional networks spatially overlap, and importantly, SDL methods are significantly better than ICA methods when spatial overlaps between networks are moderate or severe. This work offers empirical better understanding of ICA and SDL algorithms in inferring functional networks from fMRI data and provides new guidelines and caveats when constructing and interpreting functional networks in the era of fMRI-based connectomics.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0018-9294
1558-2531
1558-2531
DOI:10.1109/TBME.2018.2831186