What’s new in visual masking?
A brief display that is clearly visible when shown alone can be rendered invisible by the subsequent presentation of a second visual stimulus. Several recently described backward masking effects are not predicted by current theories of visual masking, including masking by four small dots that surrou...
Saved in:
Published in | Trends in Cognitive Sciences Vol. 4; no. 9; pp. 345 - 352 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Book Review Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.09.2000
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | A brief display that is clearly visible when shown alone can be rendered invisible by the subsequent presentation of a second visual stimulus. Several recently described backward masking effects are not predicted by current theories of visual masking, including masking by four small dots that surround (but do not touch) a target object and masking by a surrounding object that remains on display after the target object has been turned off. A crucial factor in both of these effects is attention: almost no masking occurs if attention can be rapidly focused on the target, whereas powerful masking ensues if attention directed at the target is delayed. A new theory of visual masking, inspired by developments in neuroscience, can account for these effects, as well as more traditional masking effects. In addition, the new theory sheds light on related research, such as the attentional blink, inattentional blindness and change blindness. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1364-6613 1879-307X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01520-5 |