Computational analysis based on audioprofiles: A new possibility for patient stratification in office-based otology

Genetic contribution to progressive hearing loss in adults is underestimated. Established machine learning-based software could offer a rapid supportive tool to stratify patients with progressive hearing loss. A retrospective longitudinal analysis of 141 adult patients presenting with hearing loss w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAudiology research (Pavia, Italy) Vol. 9; no. 2; p. 230
Main Authors Weininger, Oren, Warnecke, Athanasia, Lesinski-Schiedat, Anke, Lenarz, Thomas, Stolle, Stefan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 05.11.2019
MDPI AG
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Genetic contribution to progressive hearing loss in adults is underestimated. Established machine learning-based software could offer a rapid supportive tool to stratify patients with progressive hearing loss. A retrospective longitudinal analysis of 141 adult patients presenting with hearing loss was performed. Hearing threshold was measured at least twice 18 months or more apart. Based on the baseline audiogram, hearing thresholds and age were uploaded to AudioGene v4® (Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology at The University of Iowa City, IA, USA) to predict the underlying genetic cause of hearing loss and the likely progression of hearing loss. The progression of hearing loss was validated by comparison with the most recent audiogram data of the patients. The most frequently predicted loci were DFNA2B, DFNA9 and DFNA2A. The frequency of loci/genes predicted by AudioGene remains consistent when using the initial or the final audiogram of the patients. In conclusion, machine learning-based software analysis of clinical data might be a useful tool to identify patients at risk for having autosomal dominant hearing loss. With this approach, patients with suspected progressive hearing loss could be subjected to close audiological followup, genetic testing and improved patient counselling.
Bibliography:Conflict of interest: the authors declare no potential conflict of interest.
Contributions: OW acquisition and analysis of data for the work, drafting the work, final approval of the version to be published, agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. ALS, TL, conception of the work, revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published, agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; AW, SS, substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work and to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work, revising the work critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published, agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
ISSN:2039-4349
2039-4330
2039-4349
DOI:10.4081/audiores.2019.230