Randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral atenolol in patients with unexplained syncope and positive upright tilt table test results

The objective of this investigation was the assessment of the response rate of oral atenolol in patients with vasovagal syncope after 1 month of treatment. We randomized into two groups all patients referred to our unit who had had at least one episode of syncope or two episodes of presyncope 1 mont...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American heart journal Vol. 130; no. 6; pp. 1250 - 1253
Main Authors Mahanonda, Nithi, Bhuripanyo, Kiertijai, Kangkagate, Charuwan, Wansanit, Kanchana, Kulchot, Bang-on, Nademanee, Koonlawee, Chaithiraphan, Suphachai
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Mosby, Inc 01.12.1995
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The objective of this investigation was the assessment of the response rate of oral atenolol in patients with vasovagal syncope after 1 month of treatment. We randomized into two groups all patients referred to our unit who had had at least one episode of syncope or two episodes of presyncope 1 month before presentation and had a positive isuprel Tilt Table Test (TTT). Group 1 (Gr 1) received oral atenolol, and group 2 (Gr 2) received placebo medication. After a 1-month period patients were reassessed for degree of their symptoms and underwent repeated TTT. Forty-two patients were enrolled in the study. Gr 1 and Gr 2 were comparable in age (38 ± 13 years vs 43 ± 14 years, p = 0.216 and sex (male/female = 6:15 vs 10:11, p = 0.204). The severity of attack was similar in both groups. Eight patients in Gr 1 and six patients in Gr 2 had mitral valve prolapse (p = 0.5). No significant differences were seen in systolic blood pressure (122 ± 17 vs 117 ± 16 mm Hg, p = 0.334), diastolic blood pressure (70 ± 11 vs 72 ± 11 mm Hg, p = 0.677), and heart rate (79 ± 12 vs 79 ± 13, p = 0.98) between the two groups. The response rates (negative TTT) after 1 month of treatment were 62% versus 5% (p = 0.0004) in the atenolol and control group, respectively. Moreover, patients who received atenolol reported feeling better compared with those who received placebo (71% vs 29%, p = 0.02). In conclusion, atenolol significantly improved symptoms of patients with vasovagal syncope. Patients who received atenolol were more likely to have negative isuprel TTT.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-8703
1097-6744
DOI:10.1016/0002-8703(95)90150-7