Reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry is useful for assessment of not only endothelial function but also stenosis of the digital artery

• Published in: International journal of cardiology Vol. 260; pp. 178 - 183
• Main Authors: Kishimoto, Shinji, Matsumoto, Takeshi, Maruhashi, Tatsuya, Iwamoto, Yumiko, Kajikawa, Masato, Oda, Nozomu, Matsui, Shogo, Hashimoto, Haruki, Hidaka, Takayuki, Kihara, Yasuki, Chayama, Kazuaki, Goto, Chikara, Aibara, Yoshiki, Yusoff, Farina Binti Mohamad, Nakashima, Ayumu, Noma, Kensuke, Higashi, Yukihito
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.06.2018
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Angiography, Digital Subtraction - methods; Constriction, Pathologic - diagnostic imaging; Constriction, Pathologic - physiopathology; Endothelial dysfunction; Endothelium, Vascular - diagnostic imaging; Endothelium, Vascular - physiology; Female; Humans; Hyperemia - diagnostic imaging; Hyperemia - physiopathology; Male; Manometry - methods; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnostic imaging; Peripheral Arterial Disease - physiopathology; Pulse wave amplitude; Reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry; Stenosis of proper palmar digital artery; Ulnar Artery - diagnostic imaging; Ulnar Artery - physiopathology; Endothelial dysfunction; Stenosis of proper palmar digital artery; Pulse wave amplitude; Reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry
• ISSN: 0167-5273; 1874-1754; 1874-1754
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.069

Although reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) is widely used for assessment of endothelial function, RH index (RHI) cannot be measured in some cases when pulse wave amplitude (PWA) is very low. Decrease in PWA is mainly caused by proper palmar digital artery (PPDA) stenosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between PWA measured by RH-PAT and stenosis of the PPDA measured by digital subtraction angiography and to evaluate the limitation of assessment of endothelial function measured by RHI in patients with PPDA stenosis. We measured baseline PWA in 51 fingers including the first to third fingers of both hands in 10 patients who had PPDA stenosis and in 66 fingers that were the first fingers of both hands in 33 subjects who had no PPDA stenosis. Severe stenosis was defined as over 75% by lower percent diameter stenosis between two PPDAs in a finger. PWA was significantly correlated with stenosis of the digital artery (r=−0.55; P<0.0001). A PWV value of 300mV was the optimal cut-off value for severe stenosis (sensitivity, 84.0%; specificity, 88.5%). Log RHI was significantly lower in patients with PPDA stenosis than in subjects without PPDA stenosis (0.33±0.27 versus 0.73±0.27, P=0.007). RH-PAT may be useful for assessment of not only endothelial function but also PPDA stenosis. RHI may be underestimated in patients with PPDA stenosis. We should pay attention to low baseline PWA when measuring RHI. URL for clinical trial: http://UMIN; registration number for clinical trial: UMIN000003409.