Primate cognition in zoos: Reviewing the impact of zoo‐based research over 15 years

• Published in: American journal of primatology Vol. 84; no. 10; pp. e23369 - n/a
• Main Authors: McEwen, Emma S., Warren, Elizabeth, Tenpas, Sadie, Jones, Benjamin, Durdevic, Kresimir, Rapport Munro, Emilie, Call, Josep
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States John Wiley and Sons Inc 01.10.2022
• Subjects: Animals; Animals, Zoo; Behavior, Animal; Cognition; Humans; methodology; primate cognition; Primates; Review; zoo research; primate cognition; zoo research; methodology
• ISSN: 0275-2565; 1098-2345; 1098-2345
• DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23369

Primate cognition research is reliant on access to members of the study sp ecies and logistical infrastructures to conduct observations and experiments. Historically founded in research centers and private collections, and spreading to modern zoos, sanctuaries, and the field, primate cognition has been investigated in diverse settings, each with benefits and challenges. In our systematic review of 12 primatology, animal behavior, and animal cognition journals over the last 15 years, we turn a spotlight on zoos to quantify their current impact on the field and to highlight their potential as robust contributors to future work. To put zoo‐based research in context, we compare zoos to three other site types: university‐owned or independent research centers, sanctuaries, and field sites. We assess the contributions of zoos across several critical considerations in primate cognition research, including number of investigations, species diversity, sample size, research topic diversity, and methodology. We identified 1119 publications reporting studies of primate cognition, almost 25% of which report research conducted in zoos. Across publications, zoo‐based research has greater species diversity than research centers and covers a diverse range of research topics. Although our review is merely a snapshot of primate cognition research, our findings suggest that zoos may present advantages to researchers regarding species diversity, and lack some of the methodological constraints of field sites, allowing greater ease of access to a diverse range of subjects for cognition investigations. We suggest that zoos have great potential as key contributors for future investigations in primate cognition. Finally, we shed light on the symbiotic relationship that can emerge between researchers and zoos, forming partnerships that bring unique advantages to both parties. Locations of all sites indentified in this study as locations of primate cognition research. Site type is indicated by color, point size indicates the number of studies from each site. Highlights Zoo‐based research contributes ~25% of publications in primate cognition Zoos offer high species diversity in cognitive research Research in zoos encompasses a wide and balanced array of topics within primate cognition