Role of particle geometry and surface contacts in solid-phase reactions

Given the surface areas of three different species A, B, and C, what is the most likely contact area between A and B? This problem finds many applications, but it is of specific importance in solid‐phase reactions. Reactions in powder mixtures depend strongly on contact area between reactants, even...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAIChE journal Vol. 48; no. 8; pp. 1794 - 1803
Main Authors Kostogorova, J., Viljoen, H. J., Shteinberg, A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.08.2002
Wiley Subscription Services
American Institute of Chemical Engineers
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Given the surface areas of three different species A, B, and C, what is the most likely contact area between A and B? This problem finds many applications, but it is of specific importance in solid‐phase reactions. Reactions in powder mixtures depend strongly on contact area between reactants, even when one species may melt. The surface of particles is meshed with small “tiles,” and a combinatorial problem is formulated to map all tiles onto each other. The number of different contacts of n constituents is \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n i$\end{document}; if pores are present, they are considered a constituent. The combinatorial problem for n > 3 is computationally overwhelming, but for two or three species, the desirable contacts can be calculated. The model was developed for contact between three different species (two species are included as a special case). This could constitute three different powders at 100% MTD, or a mixture of two powders that includes pores where the latter phase acts as a third species. The combinatorial approach is used to find the discrete probability‐distribution function (PDF), viz., p(z, A, B, C), where z is the number of desirable contacts (for example, A∖︁B), given the surface areas (A, B, C). The first moment of the PDF gives the expectancy value Ψ (A∖︁B, A, B, C) for contact between species A and B. The theory was demonstrated by two examples. A simple contact problem is solved for two powders that also contain pores. The second example compares kinetic rates for different shapes and sizes of particles.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-80WBH2Q7-0
ArticleID:AIC690480819
istex:DA584812985D91ED882FAF830F14DB684F55C97C
ISSN:0001-1541
1547-5905
DOI:10.1002/aic.690480819