Analysis of treatment outcome for lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive alpha-fetoprotein-positive hepatocellular carcinoma in relation to post-treatment disappearance of protein

[Abstract] Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the influence of the rating “Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive alpha-fetoprotein (AFA L3) positive” on the outcome of treatment. Materials and methods: The study involved 232 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma rated as having liver damage...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Microwave Surgery Vol. 29; pp. 109 - 113
Main Authors Yasuko, Kawasaki, Kiyohide, Kioka, Takashi, Nakai, Yumi, Ishida, Hirotsugu, Maruyama, Shinsuke, Hiramatsu, Aroka, Mori, Takehisa, Suekane, Tomoaki, Yamasaki, Koji, Sano, Masatsugu, Shiba, Hiroko, Nebiki, Hiroyuki, Sato, Akishige, Kanazawa, Sadatoshi, Shimizu, Tadashi, Tsukamoto
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Japanese
Published 特定非営利活動法人 Microwave Surgery研究会 2011
メディカルレビュー社
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Abstract] Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the influence of the rating “Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive alpha-fetoprotein (AFA L3) positive” on the outcome of treatment. Materials and methods: The study involved 232 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma rated as having liver damage class AB hepatopathy, a single tumor, tumor diameter 2 cm or smaller, no vascular invasion, and no extrahepatic lesion for whom AFP-L3 (“L3”) was measured at our hospital between 1994 and 2008. In these patients, the outcome of treatment was analyzed in relation to presence/absence (positive/negative) of L3 before treatment and post-treatment disappearance or persistence of L3 in pre-treatmene L3-positive cases. Results: The cumulative survival rate was significantly lower for L3-positive cases than for L3-negative cases (p=0.008). Neither the cumulative survival rate in L3-positive cases nor the post-treatment L3 disappearance rate in L3-positive cases before treatment differed significantly depending on the method of treatment (p=0.7501, p=0.3286). The cumulative survival rate was significantly higher for cases becoming L3 negative after treatment than for those failing to become L3-negative after treatment (p=0.035). Conclusion: The prognosis was poorer in L3-positive cases than in L3-negative cases. Among L3-positive cases before treatment, the prognosis was poorer in cases failing to become L3-negative after treatment than in those becoming L3-negative after treatment.
ISSN:0917-7728
1882-210X
DOI:10.3380/jmicrowavesurg.29.109