Efficacy and safety of topical resorcinol 15% versus topical clindamycin 1% in the management of mild‐to‐moderate hidradenitis suppurativa: A retrospective study
Topical and systemic antibiotic therapy remains the first‐line treatment for mild‐to‐moderate hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, literature data on antibiotic resistance in HS are growing. A total of 134 patients with mild‐to‐moderate HS were retrospectively evaluated. Seventy‐three patients (g...
Saved in:
Published in | Dermatologic therapy Vol. 35; no. 6; pp. e15439 - n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken, USA
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.06.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Topical and systemic antibiotic therapy remains the first‐line treatment for mild‐to‐moderate hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, literature data on antibiotic resistance in HS are growing. A total of 134 patients with mild‐to‐moderate HS were retrospectively evaluated. Seventy‐three patients (group A) received topical clindamycin 1% and 61 patients (group B) received topical resorcinol 15%. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of topical 15% resorcinol versus topical 1% clindamycin in mild‐to‐moderate HS, comparing the clinical response at 12 weeks of treatment. Patients treated with resorcinol 15% showed a significant improvement in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System, and Pain Visual Analogue Scale score from baseline compared to patients treated with clindamycin 1%. Topical resorcinol 15% could be a valid alternative to clindamycin in the management of acute and long‐standing HS, limiting antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1396-0296 1529-8019 |
DOI: | 10.1111/dth.15439 |