Comparative efficacy of different types of antihypertensive drugs in reversing left ventricular hypertrophy as determined with echocardiography in hypertensive patients: A network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Reversing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) can reduce the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events. However, there is no clear superiority–inferiority differentiation between angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), beta‐blockers (BB), calcium channel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) Vol. 22; no. 12; pp. 2175 - 2183
Main Authors Chen, Jian‐Shu, Pei, Ying, Li, Cai‐e, Li, Yin‐ning, Wang, Qiong‐ying, Yu, Jing
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley and Sons Inc 01.12.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Reversing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) can reduce the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events. However, there is no clear superiority–inferiority differentiation between angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), beta‐blockers (BB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), and diuretics in reversing LVH in hypertensive patients. To provide further evidence for choosing the optimal antihypertensive drug for improving LVH, we performed a network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on the Cochrane library database, Embase, and Pubmed, and identified 49 studies involving 5402 patients that were eligible for inclusion. It was found that ARB could improve LVH in hypertensive patients more effectively than CCB (MD −4.07, 95%CI −8.03 to −0.24) and BB (MD −4.57, 95%CI −8.07 to −1.12). Matched comparison of renin‐angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) showed that the effect of ACEI in reducing left ventricular mass index (LVMi) was not effective as that of ARB (MD −3.72, 95%CI −7.52 to −0.11). The surface under the cumulative ranking for each intervention indicated that the use of ARB was more effective among the different types of antihypertensive drugs (97%). This network meta‐analysis revealed that the use of ARB in antihypertensive therapy could achieve better efficacy in reversing LVH in hypertensive patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Funding informationThis study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 81670385), Gansu province health research project (GSWSKY2017‐02), and the Cuiying Scientific and Technological Innovation Program of Lanzhou University Second Hospital (CY2017‐QN09).
The contributions of Jian‐Shu Chen and Ying Pei in this study are consistent.
ISSN:1524-6175
1751-7176
DOI:10.1111/jch.14047