Do infants have a sense of numerosity? A p‐curve analysis of infant numerosity discrimination studies
Research demonstrating that infants discriminate between small (e.g., 1 vs. 3 dots) and large numerosities (e.g., 8 vs. 16 dots) is central to theories concerning the origins of human numerical abilities. To date, there has been no quantitative meta‐analysis of the infant numerical competency data....
Saved in:
Published in | Developmental science Vol. 23; no. 2; pp. e12897 - n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Wiley-Blackwell
01.03.2020
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Research demonstrating that infants discriminate between small (e.g., 1 vs. 3 dots) and large numerosities (e.g., 8 vs. 16 dots) is central to theories concerning the origins of human numerical abilities. To date, there has been no quantitative meta‐analysis of the infant numerical competency data. Here, we quantitatively synthesize the evidential value of the available literature on infant numerosity discrimination using a meta‐analytic tool called p‐curve. In p‐curve the distribution of available p‐values is analyzed to determine whether the published literature examining particular hypotheses contains evidential value. p‐curves demonstrated evidential value for the hypotheses that infants can discriminate between both small and large unimodal and cross‐modal numerosities. However, the analyses also revealed that the published data on infants’ ability to discriminate between large numerosities is less robust and statistically powered than the data on their ability to discriminate small numerosities. We argue there is a need for adequately powered replication studies to enable stronger inferences in order to use infant data to ground theories concerning the ontogenesis of numerical cognition.
Four p‐curve analyses were performed assessing the evidential value of the infant numerosity discrimination literature. Small numerosity discrimination studies demonstrated evidential value that infants are able to discriminate between two small numerosities. The large numerosity discrimination studies suggested evidential value that was less robust when examined further. More replication studies should be done addressing the question of whether infants can discriminate between large numerosities. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information This research was funded by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant #342192. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1363-755X 1467-7687 1467-7687 |
DOI: | 10.1111/desc.12897 |