Topical cannabis‐based medicines – A novel paradigm and treatment for non‐uremic calciphylaxis leg ulcers: An open label trial

• Published in: International wound journal Vol. 17; no. 5; pp. 1508 - 1516
• Main Authors: Maida, Vincent, Shi, Runjie B., Fazzari, Francesco G. T., Zomparelli, Lydia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2020
• Subjects: Aged; Analgesics; Calciphylaxis - drug therapy; Cannabis; Cohort Studies; endocannabinoid system; Female; Humans; Leg Ulcer - complications; Leg Ulcer - drug therapy; non‐uremic Calciphylaxis; Original; Prospective Studies; topical cannabis‐based medicines; wound closure; Wound Healing; wound‐related pain; wound-related pain; endocannabinoid system; wound closure; topical cannabis-based medicines; non-uremic Calciphylaxis
• ISSN: 1742-4801; 1742-481X
• DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13484

Non‐Uremic Calciphylaxis (NUC) is a rare condition that often manifests as intractable and painful integumentary wounds, afflicting patients with a high burden of co‐morbidity. The Endocannabinoid System (ECS) is a ubiquitous signalling system that is theorised to be dysregulated within wound beds and associated peri‐wound tissues. Preclinical research has shown that the dominant chemical classes derived from the cannabis plant, cannabinoids, terpenes, and flavonoids, interact with the integumentary ECS to promote wound closure and analgesia. This is a prospective open label cohort study involving two elderly Caucasian females with recalcitrant NUC leg ulcers of greater than 6 months duration. Topical Cannabis‐Based Medicines (TCBM) composed of cannabinoids, terpenes, and flavonoids were applied daily to both the wound bed and peri‐wound tissues until complete wound closure was achieved. Wounds were photographed regularly, and the digital images were subjected to planimetric analysis to objectively quantify the degree of granulation and epithelization. Analgesic utilisation, as a surrogate/proxy for pain scores, was also tracked. The cohort had a mean M3 multimorbidity index score of 3.31. Complete wound closure was achieved in a mean of 76.3 days. Additionally, no analgesics were required after a mean of 63 days. The treatments were well tolerated with no adverse reactions. The positive results demonstrated in very challenging wounds such as NUC, among highly complex patients, suggest that TCBM may have an even broader role within integumentary and wound management. This treatment paradigm warrants being trialled in other wound types and classes, and ultimately should be subjected to randomised controlled trials.