Comparisons of risk prediction methods using nested case‐control data

Using both simulated and real datasets, we compared two approaches for estimating absolute risk from nested case‐control (NCC) data and demonstrated the feasibility of using the NCC design for estimating absolute risk. In contrast to previously published results, we successfully demonstrated not onl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStatistics in medicine Vol. 36; no. 3; pp. 455 - 465
Main Authors Salim, Agus, Delcoigne, Bénédicte, Villaflores, Krystyn, Koh, Woon‐Puay, Yuan, Jian‐Min, Dam, Rob M., Reilly, Marie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 10.02.2017
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Using both simulated and real datasets, we compared two approaches for estimating absolute risk from nested case‐control (NCC) data and demonstrated the feasibility of using the NCC design for estimating absolute risk. In contrast to previously published results, we successfully demonstrated not only that data from a matched NCC study can be used to unbiasedly estimate absolute risk but also that matched studies give better statistical efficiency and classify subjects into more appropriate risk categories. Our result has implications for studies that aim to develop or validate risk prediction models. In addition to the traditional full cohort study and case‐cohort study, researchers designing these studies now have the option of performing a NCC study with huge potential savings in cost and resources. Detailed explanations on how to obtain the absolute risk estimates under the proposed approach are given. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0277-6715
1097-0258
1097-0258
DOI:10.1002/sim.7143