Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibition) model to support dose rationale in diabetes patients, including those with renal impairment, for once‐weekly administered omarigliptin

Aims To characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the once‐weekly dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitor omarigliptin in healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and use these models to support the dosing recommendation for patient labelling...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of clinical pharmacology Vol. 85; no. 12; pp. 2759 - 2771
Main Authors Jain, Lokesh, Chain, Anne S.Y., Tatosian, Daniel A., Hing, Jeremy, Passarell, Julie A., Kauh, Eunkyung A., Lai, Eseng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England John Wiley and Sons Inc 01.12.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims To characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the once‐weekly dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitor omarigliptin in healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and use these models to support the dosing recommendation for patient labelling including patients with renal impairment. Methods PK and PD were assessed from a total of 9827 omarigliptin concentrations collected from 1387 healthy subjects and patients participating in Phase 1, 2 and 3 studies examining single‐ or multiple‐dose weekly administration of omarigliptin at doses ranging from 0.25 to 400 mg. Population PK and PD analyses were performed using nonlinear mixed effect modelling. Results A semi‐mechanistic 2‐compartment model with linear unbound clearance and concentration‐dependent binding of omarigliptin to the DPP‐4 enzyme in both the central and peripheral compartments adequately described omarigliptin PK. Key covariates on omarigliptin PK included reduced unbound clearance with renal impairment. A direct effect sigmoid maximum inhibitory efficacy model adequately described the relationship between omarigliptin plasma concentrations and DPP‐4 inhibition. These models supported the current Japan label instructions that the approved omarigliptin 25‐mg once‐weekly dose be halved in patients with severe renal impairment and in those with end‐stage renal disease. Also, if patients missed a dose, the next dose of omarigliptin should be taken as soon as remembered up to and including the day before the next scheduled dose. No other clinically important covariates were identified. Conclusion The models in the present analysis adequately described PK and PD characteristics of omarigliptin and supported the dosing and administration section of the omarigliptin label.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Principal Investigator: The authors confirm that the PI for this paper is Lokesh Jain and that he had direct responsibility for the analysis.
ISSN:0306-5251
1365-2125
1365-2125
DOI:10.1111/bcp.14103