Social network analysis: New ethical approaches through collective reflexivity. Introduction to the special issue of Social Networks
•Ethical issues in SNA research extend beyond anonymity and consent.•SNA ethics can progress through the active participation of researchers.•Reflexivity will enable a more ethically ‘virtuous’ approach to SNA research.•Indirect reciprocity and mutual learning can facilitate reflexivity in the SNA c...
Saved in:
Published in | Social networks Vol. 67; pp. 1 - 8 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01.10.2021
Elsevier Science Ltd Elsevier |
Series | Recent ethical challenges in social network analysis |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •Ethical issues in SNA research extend beyond anonymity and consent.•SNA ethics can progress through the active participation of researchers.•Reflexivity will enable a more ethically ‘virtuous’ approach to SNA research.•Indirect reciprocity and mutual learning can facilitate reflexivity in the SNA community.
Research in social network analysis (SNA) faces unprecedented ethical challenges today due to both technological developments (‘big’ data) and a growing tendency toward institutionalization of ethics governance. We argue that a suitable response requires a more comprehensive approach to SNA ethics, and we identify two main paths toward this goal. First, we need to recognize the breadth of the subject, no longer limited to anonymity and consent. Second, we need to encourage the active participation and contribution of SNA scholars. We advocate a need for greater reflexivity at both individual and collective levels, whereby researchers can learn from their own and their peers’ experiences, and foster a more ethically ‘virtuous’ approach within the whole SNA community. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 0378-8733 1879-2111 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.socnet.2020.12.001 |