Psychometrics of Art - Validation of RizbA, a Quantitative Rating Instrument for Pictorial Expression

Although art has been subject to psychological research for some time, the artwork itself received little attention in quantitative research. The rating instrument for two-dimensional pictorial works (RizbA) fills this gap by providing a tool for formal picture analysis. This study validates the que...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCreativity research journal Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 213 - 227
Main Authors Schoch, Kerstin, Ostermann, Thomas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia Routledge 03.04.2022
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although art has been subject to psychological research for some time, the artwork itself received little attention in quantitative research. The rating instrument for two-dimensional pictorial works (RizbA) fills this gap by providing a tool for formal picture analysis. This study validates the questionnaire on 294 images created by 147 non-artists. In an online test-retest study the material was rated by 880 (T1) and 475 (T2) experts in visual art using RizbA. Statistical quality criteria, Principal component analysis (PCA) and indices of factor similarity were computed. The overall test's capacity of differentiation yields a partial eta-squared of .28 (T1) and .33 (T2). Test-retest reliability is .93. PCA reveals an eight-factors solution. Tucker's coefficients of congruence range between |0.82| and |1.00|. Intraclass correlation coefficients are .81 (T1) and .84 (T2). Results indicate generalizability to nonprofessional art. As the first reliable tool for picture analysis, RizbA allows a more detailed examination of art and its correlates.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1040-0419
1532-6934
DOI:10.1080/10400419.2021.1987734