Indirect Estimation of Chlamydia Screening Coverage Using Public Health Surveillance Data

Although routine screening of all sexually active adolescent females for Chlamydia trachomatis infection is recommended at least annually in the United States, no national or state-specific population-based estimates of chlamydia screening coverage are known to exist. Conclusions regarding screening...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of epidemiology Vol. 160; no. 1; pp. 91 - 96
Main Authors Levine, William C., Dicker, Linda W., Devine, Owen, Mosure, Debra J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cary, NC Oxford University Press 01.07.2004
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although routine screening of all sexually active adolescent females for Chlamydia trachomatis infection is recommended at least annually in the United States, no national or state-specific population-based estimates of chlamydia screening coverage are known to exist. Conclusions regarding screening coverage have often been based on surveys of health care provider or facility screening practices, but such surveys do not consider persons who do not seek care at these facilities or who seek care at more than one facility. The authors developed a method to estimate the proportion of sexually active females aged 15–19 years screened for chlamydia in 45 states and the District of Columbia by using national data on chlamydia positivity, estimates of sexual activity from the National Survey of Family Growth, and chlamydial infections reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Because of uncertainty regarding these values and related assumptions, credibility intervals were calculated by using a Monte Carlo model. When this model was used, the median state-specific proportion of sexually active females aged 15–19 years screened in 2000 was 60% (90% credibility interval: 55, 66). These results and this method should be evaluated for their utility in guiding implementation of national and state chlamydia control programs.
Bibliography:Received for publication December 8, 2003; accepted for publication January 16, 2004.
istex:11CD9B54B129C1A71F64BF0C35C686A7E781B7F5
local:kwh162
ark:/67375/HXZ-GPRKLLBW-1
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9262
1476-6256
0002-9262
DOI:10.1093/aje/kwh162