Behavior of Extracranial-to-Intracranial Extended Arterial Dissections of the Vertebral Artery

Vertebral artery dissections (VADs) may extend from the extracranial to the intracranial vasculature (e+iVAD). We evaluated how the characteristics of e+iVAD differed from those of intracranial VAD (iVAD). From 2002 to 2019, among consecutive patients with cervicocephalic dissection, those with iVAD...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Heart Association Vol. 13; no. 9; p. e031032
Main Authors Park, So Young, Lee, Jin Soo, Kim, Min, Jung, Woo Sang, Choi, Jin Wook, Hong, Ji Man, Lee, Seong-Joon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England John Wiley and Sons Inc 07.05.2024
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Vertebral artery dissections (VADs) may extend from the extracranial to the intracranial vasculature (e+iVAD). We evaluated how the characteristics of e+iVAD differed from those of intracranial VAD (iVAD). From 2002 to 2019, among consecutive patients with cervicocephalic dissection, those with iVAD and e+iVAD were included, and their clinical characteristics were compared. In patients with unruptured dissections, a composite clinical outcome of subsequent ischemic events, subsequent hemorrhagic stroke, or mortality was evaluated. High-resolution magnetic resonance images were analyzed to evaluate intracranial remodeling index. Among 347 patients, 51 (14.7%) had e+iVAD and 296 (85.3%) had iVAD. The hemorrhagic presentation occurred solely in iVAD (0.0% versus 19.3%), whereas e+iVAD exhibited higher ischemic presentation (84.3% versus 27.4%; <0.001). e+iVAD predominantly presented steno-occlusive morphology (88.2% versus 27.7%) compared with dilatation patterns (11.8% versus 72.3%; <0.001) of iVAD. The ischemic presentation was significantly associated with e+iVAD (iVAD as a reference; adjusted odds ratio, 3.97 [95% CI, 1.67-9.45]; =0.002]). Patients with unruptured VAD showed no differences in the rate of composite clinical outcome between the groups (log-rank, =0.996). e+iVAD had a lower intracranial remodeling index (1.4±0.3 versus 1.6±0.4; <0.032) and a shorter distance from dural entry to the maximal dissecting segment (6.9±8.4 versus 15.7±7.4; <0.001). e+iVAD is associated with lower rates of hemorrhages and higher rates of ischemia than iVAD at the time of admission. This may be explained by a lower intracranial remodeling index and less deep intrusion of the dissecting segment into the intracranial space.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 9.
This manuscript was sent to Jean‐Marc Olivot, MD, PhD, Guest Editor, for review by expert referees, editorial decision, and final disposition.
ISSN:2047-9980
2047-9980
DOI:10.1161/JAHA.123.031032