Nosocomial blood-borne infection secondary to intravascular devices

A total of 143 patients with 159 episodes of intravascular device, blood-borne infection were studied. All infections were confirmed by the same organism being recovered from blood culture and by semiquantitative culture of the catheter tip. Sites of infection included the peripheral venous Une (n =...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of surgery Vol. 167; no. 2; pp. 268 - 272
Main Authors Fry, Donald E., Fry, Rosemary V., Borzotta, Anthony P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.02.1994
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A total of 143 patients with 159 episodes of intravascular device, blood-borne infection were studied. All infections were confirmed by the same organism being recovered from blood culture and by semiquantitative culture of the catheter tip. Sites of infection included the peripheral venous Une (n = 72), central catheter (n = 49), arterial Une (n = 18), subclavian dialysis catheter (n = 12), Swan-Ganz catheter (n = 4), Broviac catheter (n = 3), and transvenous pacemaker wires (n = 1). Staphylococcus aureus (n = 78) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 33) predominated as pathogens. Excessive length of catheterization was implicated as directly responsible for this complication in patients with peripheral intravenous and arterial lines. Nosocomial staphylococcal bacteremia must be considered secondary to an indwelling intravascular device until proven otherwise. Appropriate therapy requires removal of the catheters, excision of the vein if suppuration or persistent bacteremia is identified, and specific antibiotic therapy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/0002-9610(94)90090-6