Generation and Detection of True and False Alibi Statements

This article reports two experiments focusing on two stages of the alibi process. In Experiment 1, participants generated a true or false alibi for one of two dates (short or long delay). Results showed that participants were most likely to report that they could get alibi corroboration from a motiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychiatry, psychology, and law Vol. 20; no. 4; pp. 619 - 638
Main Authors Culhane, Scott E., Kehn, Andre, Horgan, Allyson J., Meissner, Christian A., Hosch, Harmon M., Wodahl, Eric J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis Group 01.08.2013
Subjects
alibi
alibi generation
autobiographical memory
Corroboration
deception detection
Detection
Distinguishing
Eyewitnesses
Identification
Power
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This article reports two experiments focusing on two stages of the alibi process. In Experiment 1, participants generated a true or false alibi for one of two dates (short or long delay). Results showed that participants were most likely to report that they could get alibi corroboration from a motivated alibi witnesses regardless of whether they were being truthful or deceptive. Changes in details to the generated alibi were frequent for both true and false statements. In Experiment 2, individuals were asked to discriminate between true and false statements. The results indicated that participants were no better than chance at detecting lies. As has been seen with in other domains (e.g. eyewitness identification), confidence had no predictive power in distinguishing lies from true statements.
Bibliography:PSYCHIATRY, PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW, Vol. 20, No. 4, August 2013, 619-638
Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1321-8719
1934-1687
DOI:10.1080/13218719.2012.729018