Social status modulates the neural response to unfairness

In human society, which is organized by social hierarchies, resources are usually allocated unequally and based on social status. In this study, we analyze how being endowed with different social statuses in a math competition affects the perception of fairness during asset allocation in a subsequen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 1 - 10
Main Authors Hu, Jie, Blue, Philip R, Yu, Hongbo, Gong, Xiaoliang, Xiang, Yang, Jiang, Changjun, Zhou, Xiaolin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.01.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In human society, which is organized by social hierarchies, resources are usually allocated unequally and based on social status. In this study, we analyze how being endowed with different social statuses in a math competition affects the perception of fairness during asset allocation in a subsequent Ultimatum Game (UG). Behavioral data showed that when participants were in high status, they were more likely to reject unfair UG offers than in low status. This effect of social status correlated with activity in the right anterior insula (rAI) and with the functional connectivity between the rAI and a region in the anterior middle cingulate cortex, indicating that these two brain regions are crucial for integrating contextual factors and social norms during fairness perception. Additionally, there was an interaction between social status and UG offer fairness in the amygdala and thalamus, implicating the role of these regions in the modulation of social status on fairness perception. These results demonstrate the effect of social status on fairness perception and the potential neural underpinnings for this effect.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Jie Hu and Philip Blue contributed equally to this study.
ISSN:1749-5016
1749-5024
DOI:10.1093/scan/nsv086