Opportunities and challenges of other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) for biodiversity conservation
[Display omitted] •The inclusion of OECMs into the post-2020 GBF may enable the recognition of other actors.•OECMs can contribute to improve linkages between equitable and effective conservation.•OECM’s identification, reporting and monitoring are a challenge.•Robust guidelines, and improved monitor...
Saved in:
Published in | Perspectives in ecology and conservation Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 115 - 120 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier B.V
01.04.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | [Display omitted]
•The inclusion of OECMs into the post-2020 GBF may enable the recognition of other actors.•OECMs can contribute to improve linkages between equitable and effective conservation.•OECM’s identification, reporting and monitoring are a challenge.•Robust guidelines, and improved monitoring, are recommended to ensure OECMs integrity.
In 2010, the Convention on Biological Diversity adopted the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020. As international attention turns to the development of the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, discussions are focusing on the way in which other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) should be reflected in the Framework. To inform this discussion, we gathered in-depth perspectives and expert elicitation on the opportunities and challenges that OECMs offer and present to biodiversity conservation. To do so, we conducted semi-structured interviews with experts involved in OECM-related deliberations. The explicit consideration of OECMs in conservation policy represents a recognition that there are sites outside of formal protected area networks that benefit biodiversity and ecosystems in important ways. However, these benefits and the future social and ecological impacts of OECMs will depend largely on robust guidelines for their identification, effective monitoring, and whether relevant actors report the areas they govern as OECMs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2530-0644 2530-0644 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.pecon.2021.01.004 |