The original versus a modified inside-out transobturator procedure: 1-year results of a prospective randomized trial

Introduction and hypothesis The aim of this study is to compare a modified inside-out transobturator procedure with its original counterpart [inside-out transobturator (TVT-O)] for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods A prospective, randomized trial in women suffering f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational Urogynecology Journal Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 145 - 156
Main Authors de Leval, Jean, Thomas, Alexandre, Waltregny, David
Format Journal Article Web Resource
LanguageEnglish
Published London Springer-Verlag 01.02.2011
Springer Nature B.V
Springer Science & Business Media B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction and hypothesis The aim of this study is to compare a modified inside-out transobturator procedure with its original counterpart [inside-out transobturator (TVT-O)] for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods A prospective, randomized trial in women suffering from SUI was used. The modified procedure consisted of a shorter tape whilst the scissors or guide no longer perforated the obturator membrane. The primary outcome was the resolution of subjective and objective SUI at 1 year. Secondary outcome measures included adverse events, quality of life measures, and groin pain. Results One hundred seventy-five patients were randomized. No intraoperative complications were recorded. The SUI cure rate was 91.7% versus 90.7% (original versus modified, respectively; p  = 0.824). Incidence and intensity of groin pain was higher in the original TVT-O group on day 0 and 1 ( p  < 0.05), requiring more analgesics ( p  = 0.015) but not thereafter. Conclusions At 1 year follow-up, the modified inside-out transobturator tape procedure was as efficient and safe as the original technique but associated with less immediate postoperative groin pain.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
scopus-id:2-s2.0-79951655048
ISSN:0937-3462
1433-3023
1433-3023
DOI:10.1007/s00192-010-1264-4