Systems thinking and environmental concern

Systems thinking is thought to facilitate complex decision-making, but relatively little is known about its psychological underpinning. We present three studies that situate a measure of the construct in relation to other dispositional measures that have received more attention in environmental psyc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of environmental psychology Vol. 46; pp. 143 - 153
Main Authors Lezak, Stephen B., Thibodeau, Paul H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier India Pvt Ltd 01.06.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Systems thinking is thought to facilitate complex decision-making, but relatively little is known about its psychological underpinning. We present three studies that situate a measure of the construct in relation to other dispositional measures that have received more attention in environmental psychology and by testing whether the mindset predicts behavior in a set of novel decision making tasks. In Study 1, we find that systems thinkers tend to believe in scientific consensus, recognize risks posed by climate change, and support policy interventions to address climate change; systems thinking was negatively related to conspiracist and free-market ideation. In Studies 2 and 3 we find that systems thinkers ascribe more value to the natural world — both in monetary terms as well as on social and ecological grounds. The findings suggest that models of environmental cognition can be improved by measuring peoples' tendency to engage in systems thinking. •Systems thinking is thought to facilitate decision making in complex domains.•Here we explore the psychological underpinning of the construct.•We find it predicts judgments in novel environmental decision making tasks.•Systems thinking can be a valuable tool for research into environmental cognition.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0272-4944
1522-9610
DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.005