Numerical modeling for the combustion of simulated solid rocket motor propellant

• Published in: Computers & fluids Vol. 89; pp. 29 - 37
• Main Authors: Hegab, A.M., Sait, H.H., Hussain, A., Said, A.S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2014
• Subjects: Alternating-Direction-Implicit (ADI) solver; AP/HTPB; Binders; Combustion; Computer simulation; Level set method; Mathematical models; Moving interfaces; Navier-Stokes equations; Propellants; Regression; Sandwich propellant; Solid rocket propellants; Unsteady; Moving interfaces; Alternating-Direction-Implicit (ADI) solver; Level set method; Solid rocket propellants; Sandwich propellant; AP/HTPB
• ISSN: 0045-7930; 1879-0747
• DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.10.029

•We simulate the complex burning of microscale solid rocket heterogeneous propellant.•We examine the fluid mechanic effect on the shape of the generated flame and surface.•The results may provide the designers with tools to redesign the propellants.•Increasing information will be an important step to simulate the whole rocket system. The numerical procedure for the burning of Ammonium Perchlorate (AP) with a Fuel-Binder (Hydroxyl Terminated Polybutadience HTPB) heterogeneous propellant is presented. This model accounts for the two-step reaction mechanism for the primary diffusion flame at the interface between Binder (B) and the oxidizer AP and the AP premixed flame. The complete coupling between the gas-phase, the condensed-phase, and the unsteady non-uniform regression of the propellant surface is considered. The parameters used in this model are chosen to fit experimental data for the burning of the composite AP/Binder. The propagation of the unsteady non-planer regression surface is described, using the Essentially-Non-Oscillatory (ENO) scheme with the aid of the level set strategy. The Alternating-Direction-Implicit (ADI) solver is employed to solve the full Navier–Stokes equations in the gas phase for the variable density model. The results show the effect of various parameters on the surface propagation speed, flame structure, and the burning surface geometry. A comparison between the computational and experimental results is presented.