Development and Evaluation of a New Chest Compression Technique for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Infants

We designed the newly developed flexed two-finger chest compression technique for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in infants to increase the quality of chest compression by considering the advantages and disadvantages of the two-thumb encircling hand technique and conventional two-finger techniq...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPediatric cardiology Vol. 40; no. 6; pp. 1217 - 1223
Main Authors Yang, Dongjun, Kim, Kwan Ho, Oh, Je Hyeok, Son, Sunhan, Cho, Junmo, Seo, Kyung Mook
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 15.08.2019
Springer
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We designed the newly developed flexed two-finger chest compression technique for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in infants to increase the quality of chest compression by considering the advantages and disadvantages of the two-thumb encircling hand technique and conventional two-finger technique. The aim of the study is to compare the performance of the flexed two-finger technique and the currently used two-thumb technique or two-finger technique for infant CPR. A total of 42 doctors conducted 2-min single-rescuer CPR on a cardiac arrest infant model using the two-thumb technique followed, in a random order, by the two-finger technique and the flexed two-finger technique. Although the ratio of the adequate compression depth was highest in the two-thumb technique, followed by the flexed two-finger technique and two-finger technique (100% [98–100] vs. 99% [80–100] vs. 76% [42–95], respectively, P  < 0.001), the hand-off time of the two-thumb technique was significantly longer than in the two-finger technique and flexed two-finger technique (31 s [28–35] vs. 29 s [27–32] vs. 29 s [26–32], respectively, P  < 0.001). The number of total chest compressions of the two-thumb technique was significantly lower than in the two-finger technique and flexed two-finger technique (150 [148–159] vs. 159 [149–173] vs. 162 [150–172], respectively, P  < 0.001). The newly developed chest compression technique could provide adequate compression depth without increasing the hand-off time during single-rescuer infant CPR. Trial registration : Clinical Research Information Service, KCT0002730.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0172-0643
1432-1971
DOI:10.1007/s00246-019-02135-x