A systematic review of leader credibility: its murky framework needs clarity

“Leader credibility” is believed by many scholars as essential for effective leadership and is commonly used in discussions about leaders in business, politics, and other areas. Yet despite leader credibility’s strong presence in contemporary press and research, the “leader credibility” construct is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inManagement review quarterly Vol. 73; no. 4; pp. 1751 - 1794
Main Authors Williams, Ralph I., Raffo, Deana M., Randy Clark, W., Clark, Leigh Anne
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 01.12.2023
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:“Leader credibility” is believed by many scholars as essential for effective leadership and is commonly used in discussions about leaders in business, politics, and other areas. Yet despite leader credibility’s strong presence in contemporary press and research, the “leader credibility” construct is not clearly conceptualized, and a grounded understanding of leader credibility is missing. To begin building a solid foundation of leader credibility knowledge, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR), which included 108 peer-reviewed articles representing various disciplines. This paper presents our descriptive and content-based findings. Our results reveal a significant research gap: despite the breadth and depth of the research on leader credibility, leader credibility is not consistently defined or measured. We provide an accounting of knowledge to date and illustrate this concept’s weak footing. Finally, we outline an array of relevant research paths that are possible after scholars reconceptualize the leader credibility foundation.
ISSN:2198-1620
2198-1639
DOI:10.1007/s11301-022-00285-6