Exhaustiveness effects in clefts are not truth-functional
While it is widely acknowledged in the formal semantic literature that both the truth-functional focus particle only and it-clefts convey exhaustiveness, the nature and source of exhaustiveness effects with it-clefts remain contested. We describe a questionnaire study ( n = 80) and an event-related...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of neurolinguistics Vol. 24; no. 3; pp. 320 - 337 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Ltd
01.05.2011
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | While it is widely acknowledged in the formal semantic literature that both the truth-functional focus particle
only and
it-clefts convey exhaustiveness, the nature and source of exhaustiveness effects with
it-clefts remain contested. We describe a questionnaire study (
n = 80) and an event-related brain potentials (ERP) study (
n = 16) that investigated the violation of exhaustiveness in German
only-foci versus
it-clefts. The offline study showed that a violation of exhaustivity with
only is less acceptable than the violation with
it-clefts, suggesting a difference in the nature of exhaustivity interpretation in the two environments. The ERP-results confirm that this difference can be seen in online processing as well: a violation of exhaustiveness in
only-foci elicited a centro-posterior positivity (600–800ms), whereas a violation in
it-clefts induced a globally distributed N400 pattern (400–600ms). The positivity can be interpreted as a reanalysis process and more generally as a process of context updating. The N400 effect in
it-clefts is interpreted as indexing a cancelation process that is functionally distinct from the
only case. The ERP study is, to our knowledge, the first evidence from an online experimental paradigm which shows that the violation of exhaustiveness involves different underlying processes in the two structural environments. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0911-6044 1873-8052 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.10.004 |