The effects of vowels on voice perturbation measures

• Published in: Journal of voice Vol. 18; no. 3; pp. 318 - 324
• Main Authors: Akif Kiliç, Mehmet, Öğüt, Fatih, Dursun, Gürsel, Okur, Erdoğan, Yildirim, Ilhami, Midilli, Raşit
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Mosby, Inc 01.09.2004; Elsevier Science Ltd
• Subjects: Acoustics; Adult; Articulation; Comparative Studies; Humans; Jitter; Language; Languages; Linguistics; Male; Shimmer; Speech; Speech Acoustics; Speech Production Measurement; Statistical Analysis; Vocal perturbation; Vocal Production; Voice - physiology; Vowel production; Vowels; Jitter; Shimmer; Vocal perturbation; Vowel production
• ISSN: 0892-1997; 1873-4588
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2003.09.007

This study examines voice perturbation parameters of the sustained [ɑ] in English and of the eight vowels in Turkish to discover whether any difference exists between these languages, and whether a correlation exists between voice perturbation parameters and articulatory and acoustic properties of the Turkish vowels. Eight Turkish vowels uttered by 26 healthy nonsmoker volunteer males who are native Turkish speakers were compared with a voice database that includes samples of normal and disordered voices belonging to American English speakers. Fundamental frequencies, the first and second formants, and perturbation parameters, such as jitter percent, pitch perturbation quotient, shimmer percent, and amplitude perturbation quotient of the sustained vowels, were measured. Also, the first and second formants of the sustained [ɑ] in English were measured, and other parameters have been obtained from the database. When the voice perturbation parameters in Turkish and English were compared, statistically significant differences were not found. However, when Turkish vowels compared with each other, statistically significant differences were found among perturbation values. Categorical comparisons of the Turkish vowels like high-low, rounded-unrounded, and front-back revealed significant differences in perturbation values. In correlation analysis, a weak linear inverse relation between jitter percent and the first formant ( r = −0.260, p<0.05) was found.