Non-normal Data in Repeated Measures ANOVA: Impact on Type I Error and Power

Repeated measures designs are commonly used in health and social sciences research. Although there are other, more advanced, statistical analyses, the F-statistic of repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) remains the most widely used procedure for analyzing differences in means. The impac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsicothema Vol. 1; no. 35; pp. 21 - 29
Main Authors Blanca, María, Arnau, Jaume, García-Castro, F., Alarcón, Rafael, Bono, Roser
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Spain Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos (PSICODOC) 01.01.2023
Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Repeated measures designs are commonly used in health and social sciences research. Although there are other, more advanced, statistical analyses, the F-statistic of repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) remains the most widely used procedure for analyzing differences in means. The impact of the violation of normality has been extensively studied for between-subjects ANOVA, but this is not the case for RM-ANOVA. Therefore, studies that extensively and systematically analyze the robustness of RM-ANOVA under the violation of normality are needed. This paper reports the results of two simulation studies aimed at analyzing the Type I error and power of RM-ANOVA when the normality assumption is violated but sphericity is fulfilled. Study 1 considered 20 distributions, both known and unknown, and we manipulated the number of repeated measures (3, 4, 6, and 8) and sample size (from 10 to 300). Study 2 involved unequal distributions in each repeated measure. The distributions analyzed represent slight, moderate, and severe deviation from normality. Overall, the results show that the Type I error and power of the F-statistic are not altered by the violation of normality. RM-ANOVA is generally robust to non-normality when the sphericity assumption is met.
AbstractList Background:Repeated measures designs are commonly used in health and social sciences research. Although there are other, more advanced, statistical analyses, the F-statistic of repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) remains the most widely used procedure for analyzing differences in means. The impact of the violation of normality has been extensively studied for between-subjects ANOVA, but this is not the case for RM-ANOVA. Therefore, studies that extensively and systematically analyze the robustness of RM-ANOVA under the violation of normality are needed. This paper reports the results of two simulation studies aimed at analyzing the Type I error and power of RM-ANOVA when the normality assumption is violated but sphericity is fulfilled. Method:Study 1 considered 20 distributions, both known and unknown, and we manipulated the number of repeated measures (3, 4, 6, and 8) and sample size (from 10 to 300). Study 2 involved unequal distributions in each repeated measure. The distributions analyzed represent slight, moderate, and severe deviation from normality. Results:Overall, the results show that the Type I error and power of the F-statistic are not altered by the violation of normality. Conclusions:RM-ANOVA is generally robust to non-normality when the sphericity assumption is met.
Repeated measures designs are commonly used in health and social sciences research. Although there are other, more advanced, statistical analyses, the F-statistic of repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) remains the most widely used procedure for analyzing differences in means. The impact of the violation of normality has been extensively studied for between-subjects ANOVA, but this is not the case for RM-ANOVA. Therefore, studies that extensively and systematically analyze the robustness of RM-ANOVA under the violation of normality are needed. This paper reports the results of two simulation studies aimed at analyzing the Type I error and power of RM-ANOVA when the normality assumption is violated but sphericity is fulfilled. Study 1 considered 20 distributions, both known and unknown, and we manipulated the number of repeated measures (3, 4, 6, and 8) and sample size (from 10 to 300). Study 2 involved unequal distributions in each repeated measure. The distributions analyzed represent slight, moderate, and severe deviation from normality. Overall, the results show that the Type I error and power of the F-statistic are not altered by the violation of normality. RM-ANOVA is generally robust to non-normality when the sphericity assumption is met.
Repeated measures designs are commonly used in health and social sciences research. Although there are other, more advanced, statistical analyses, the F-statistic of repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) remains the most widely used procedure for analyzing differences in means. The impact of the violation of normality has been extensively studied for between-subjects ANOVA, but this is not the case for RM-ANOVA. Therefore, studies that extensively and systematically analyze the robustness of RM-ANOVA under the violation of normality are needed. This paper reports the results of two simulation studies aimed at analyzing the Type I error and power of RM-ANOVA when the normality assumption is violated but sphericity is fulfilled.BACKGROUNDRepeated measures designs are commonly used in health and social sciences research. Although there are other, more advanced, statistical analyses, the F-statistic of repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) remains the most widely used procedure for analyzing differences in means. The impact of the violation of normality has been extensively studied for between-subjects ANOVA, but this is not the case for RM-ANOVA. Therefore, studies that extensively and systematically analyze the robustness of RM-ANOVA under the violation of normality are needed. This paper reports the results of two simulation studies aimed at analyzing the Type I error and power of RM-ANOVA when the normality assumption is violated but sphericity is fulfilled.Study 1 considered 20 distributions, both known and unknown, and we manipulated the number of repeated measures (3, 4, 6, and 8) and sample size (from 10 to 300). Study 2 involved unequal distributions in each repeated measure. The distributions analyzed represent slight, moderate, and severe deviation from normality.METHODStudy 1 considered 20 distributions, both known and unknown, and we manipulated the number of repeated measures (3, 4, 6, and 8) and sample size (from 10 to 300). Study 2 involved unequal distributions in each repeated measure. The distributions analyzed represent slight, moderate, and severe deviation from normality.Overall, the results show that the Type I error and power of the F-statistic are not altered by the violation of normality.RESULTSOverall, the results show that the Type I error and power of the F-statistic are not altered by the violation of normality.RM-ANOVA is generally robust to non-normality when the sphericity assumption is met.CONCLUSIONSRM-ANOVA is generally robust to non-normality when the sphericity assumption is met.
Abstract Background: Repeated measures designs are commonly used in health and social sciences research. Although there are other, more advanced, statistical analyses, theF-statistic of repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) remains the most widely used procedure for analyzing differences in means. The impact of the violation of normality has been extensively studied for between-subjects ANOVA, but this is not the case for RM-ANOVA. Therefore, studies that extensively and systematically analyze the robustness of RM-ANOVA under the violation of normality are needed. This paper reports the results of two simulation studies aimed at analyzing the Type I error and power of RM-ANOVA when the normality assumption is violated but sphericity is fulfilled. Method: Study 1 considered 20 distributions, both known and unknown, and we manipulated the number of repeated measures (3, 4, 6, and 8) and sample size (from 10 to 300). Study 2 involved unequal distributions in each repeated measure. The distributions analyzed represent slight, moderate, and severe deviation from normality. Results: Overall, the results show that the Type I error and power of theF-statistic are not altered by the violation of normality. Conclusions: RM-ANOVA is generally robust to non-normality when the sphericity assumption is met.
Author Alarcón, Rafael
Blanca, María
García-Castro, F.
Bono, Roser
Arnau, Jaume
AuthorAffiliation Universitat de Barcelona
Universidad de Málaga
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Universidad de Málaga
– name: Universitat de Barcelona
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: María
  surname: Blanca
  fullname: Blanca, María
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jaume
  surname: Arnau
  fullname: Arnau, Jaume
– sequence: 3
  givenname: F.
  surname: García-Castro
  fullname: García-Castro, F.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Rafael
  surname: Alarcón
  fullname: Alarcón, Rafael
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Roser
  surname: Bono
  fullname: Bono, Roser
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695847$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kV9rFDEUxYNU7Lb6BXyQgC--zJp_O5n4ttTWLmxb0Sq-hUzmBqfMJGOSQfrtm3Xbgn3oQ7gQfudc7jlH6MAHDwi9pWQpORcfp9TbkH_DaBhhbMkUe4EWtGnqigrx6wAtCKOiUoquDtFRSjeErGou2St0yOtarRohF2h7GXzlQxzNgD-bbHDv8TeYwGTo8AWYNEdIeH159XP9CW_GydiMg8fXtxPgDT6NMURsfIe_hr8QX6OXzgwJ3tzPY_Tj7PT65LzaXn3ZnKy3lRVU5IqvWNfKulVSiEYYLrtWgaPgOgfUdcrVQAyjpOmIoq1rXWMlp84qAAvlnx-j5d432R6GoG_CHH1ZqL_vrte760sinBBCyyO8CD7sBVMMf2ZIWY99sjAMxkOYk2ay5KFoLWVB3z9BH92ZlJIIIv5R7-6puR2h01PsRxNv9UOwBWj2gI0hpQhO2z6b3Aefo-kHTYnedaj_71CXDouUPZE-uD8jugO-F56Q
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s10460_024_10573_4
crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nsae057
crossref_primary_10_1515_auto_2024_0031
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2023_1260396
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmars_2024_1343415
crossref_primary_10_3390_bs15020166
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2025_1537345
crossref_primary_10_3390_s24103080
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2023_1192453
crossref_primary_10_7189_jogh_15_04006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcim_2024_102886
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2024_09_006
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10649_024_10323_7
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpain_2025_1556429
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40359_023_01464_0
crossref_primary_10_1111_jsr_14452
crossref_primary_10_1111_cdev_14163
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11618_024_01284_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_autcon_2024_105876
crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nsae048
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jecp_2024_105934
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_024_06865_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pedn_2024_10_004
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2024_1375029
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ad953f
crossref_primary_10_1080_2331186X_2024_2422272
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0036147
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e17877
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyt_2024_1380620
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2025_e42128
crossref_primary_10_12973_ejper_8_1_35
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci14100972
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_freeradbiomed_2024_10_282
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pmn_2024_08_009
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2023_1303805
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnint_2024_1379208
crossref_primary_10_1080_15325024_2024_2402393
crossref_primary_10_3389_frvir_2024_1445725
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ergon_2024_103650
crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_17494
crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_240616
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_023_05326_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10763_023_10429_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cogdev_2024_101451
crossref_primary_10_1080_10790268_2024_2361552
crossref_primary_10_1111_acer_15255
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10578_024_01739_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ins_2024_120830
crossref_primary_10_3390_bs14121137
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1472551
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2023. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://www.psicothema.com/PublicationNorms2022.pdf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2023. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://www.psicothema.com/PublicationNorms2022.pdf
– notice: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7XB
88G
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
GUQSH
M2M
M2O
MBDVC
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PSYQQ
Q9U
7X8
GPN
DOI 10.7334/psicothema2022.292
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Psychology Database (Alumni)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Research Library
Psychology Database
Research Library
Research Library (Corporate)
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Publicly Available Content
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
SciELO
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Psychology
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Psychology Journals
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
DocumentTitleAlternate Datos no normales en el ANOVA de medidas repetidas: impacto en el error tipo I y potencia
EISSN 1886-144X
EndPage 29
ExternalDocumentID S1886_144X2023000100003
36695847
10_7334_psicothema2022_292
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
29P
5VS
635
8FI
8FJ
8G5
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABIVO
ABUWG
ACHQT
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADMHG
AFKRA
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AZQEC
B14
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
CCPQU
CITATION
DIK
DU5
DWQXO
EBD
EFA
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FAEIB
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GROUPED_DOAJ
GUQSH
HEY
IAO
IHR
INF
INH
INR
IPY
ITC
KQ8
M2M
M2O
N95
OK1
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PSYQQ
RNS
SV3
UKHRP
~8M
~OR
123
ALSLI
CGR
CJNVE
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
M0P
M~E
NPM
OVD
RDY
TEORI
XI7
3V.
7XB
8FK
AFPKN
MBDVC
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
GPN
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-352db76b974484a37db9ef1efdfe1fd9f6e0a2108d091bfbf8c731fc9eece2103
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 0214-9915
1886-144X
IngestDate Tue Aug 19 14:14:38 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 23:44:36 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 07:58:41 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:54:53 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:00:12 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:41:35 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 35
Keywords potencia
diseño intrasujeto
ANOVA
robustness
violation of normality
within-subject design
power
robustez
violación de la normalidad
Language English
License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c414t-352db76b974484a37db9ef1efdfe1fd9f6e0a2108d091bfbf8c731fc9eece2103
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2777040477?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 36695847
PQID 2777040477
PQPubID 6385226
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs scielo_journals_S1886_144X2023000100003
proquest_miscellaneous_2769591677
proquest_journals_2777040477
pubmed_primary_36695847
crossref_citationtrail_10_7334_psicothema2022_292
crossref_primary_10_7334_psicothema2022_292
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Spain
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Spain
– name: Oviedo
PublicationTitle Psicothema
PublicationTitleAlternate Psicothema
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos (PSICODOC)
Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias
Publisher_xml – name: Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos (PSICODOC)
– name: Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias
References Kirk, R. E. 2013
Arnau, J.; Bendayan, R.; Blanca, M. J.; Bono, R. 2014; 67
Gueorguieva, R.; Krystal, J. 2004; 61
Gunasekara, F.; Richardson, K.; Carter, K.; Blakely, T. 2014; 43
Cooper, J. A.; Garson, G. D. 2016
Bono, R.; Arnau, J.; Vallejo, G. 2010; 3
Bradley, J. V. 1978; 31
Micceri, T. 1989; 105
Arnau, J.; Bono, R.; Blanca, M. J.; Bendayan, R. 2012; 44
Blanca, M. J.; Alarcón, R.; Arnau, J.; Bono, R.; Bendayan, R. 2017; 29
Haverkamp, N.; Beauducel, A. 2017; 8
De Livera, A.; Zaloumis, S.; Simpson, J. 2014; 19
Graham, J. W. 2009; 60
Tabachnick, B. G.; Fidell, L. 2007
Fernández, P.; Vallejo, G.; Livacic-Rojas, P. E.; Tuero, E. 2010
Davis, C. S. 2002
Vallejo, G.; Fernández, P.; Livacic-Rojas, P. 2010; 31
Keselman, H. J.; Huberty, C. J.; Lix, L. M.; Olejnik, S.; Cribbie, R. A.; Donahue, B.; Kowalchuk, R. K.; Lowman, L. L.; Petoskey, M. D.; Keselman, J. C.; Levin, J. R. 1998; 68
Vallejo, G.; Lozano, L. 2006; 18
Fernández, P.; Livacic-Rojas, P.; Vallejo, G. 2007; 7
Kherad-Pajouh, S.; Renaud, O. 2015; 56
Bosley, T. 2019
Zhao, J.; Wang, C.; Totton, S.; Cullen, J.; O'Connor, A. 2019; 14
Fleishman, A. I. 1978; 43
Tamura, R.; Buelke-Sam, J. 1992; 14
Keselman, H. J.; Algina, J.; Kowalchuk, R. 2001; 54
Meltzer, J. A. 2001
Goedert, K.; Boston, R.; Barrett, A. 2013; 7
Blanca, M. J.; Alarcón, R.; Bono, R. 2018; 9
Berkovits, I.; Hancock, G.; Nevitt, J. 2000; 60
Box, G. E. P. 1953; 40
Verma, J. P. 2016
Moskowitz, D. S.; Hershberger, S. L. 2013
Haverkamp, N.; Beauducel, A. 2019; 3
Armstrong, R. 2017; 37
Keselman, H. J.; Algina, J.; Kowalchuk, R. K. 2002; 37
Cohen, J. 1988
Kowalchuk, R. K.; Keselman, H. J.; Algina, J.; Wolfinger, R. D. 2004; 64
Blanca, M. J. 2004; 16
Bathke, A.; Schabenberger, O.; Tobias, R.; Madden, L. 2009; 63
Bono, R.; Arnau, J.; Blanca, M. J.; Alarcón, R. 2016; 48
Robey, R. R.; Barcikowski, R. S. 1992; 45
Schmider, E.; Ziegler, M.; Danay, E.; Beyer, L.; Bühner, M. 2010; 6
Wilcox, R. R. 2022
Keselman, J. C.; Lix, L. M.; Keselman, H. J. 1996; 49
Bendayan, R.; Arnau, J.; Blanca, M. J.; Bono, R. 2014; 30
Schober, P.; Vetter, T. 2018; 127
Islam, M.; Chowdhury, R. 2017
Livacic-Rojas, P.; Vallejo, G.; Fernández, P. 2010; 39
Vallejo, G.; Fernández, M. P.; Livacic-Rojas, P. E.; Tuero-Herrero, E. 2011; 46
Bono, R.; Blanca, M. J.; Arnau, J.; Gómez-Benito, J. 2017; 8
Blanca, M. J.; Arnau, J.; López-Montiel, D.; Bono, R.; Bendayan, R. 2013; 9
2013
Sheskin, D. J. 2003
Raghavarao, D.; Padgett, L. 2014
Maurissen, J.; Vidmar, T. 2017; 59
Tippey, K.; Ritchey, P.; Ferris, T. 2015; 59
Singh, V.; Rana, R.; Singhal, R. 2013; 4
References_xml – volume: 60
  start-page: 877
  issue: 6
  year: 2000
  end-page: 892
  article-title: Bootstrap resampling approaches for repeated measure designs: Relative robustness to sphericity and normality violations
  publication-title: Educational and Psychological Measurement
– volume: 7
  year: 2013
  article-title: Advancing the science of spatial neglect rehabilitation: An improved statistical approach with mixed linear modeling
  publication-title: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
– year: 2019
  publication-title: Comparative power of the Friedman, Neave and Worthington match, Skillings-Mack, trimmed means repeated measures ANOVA, and bootstrap trimmed means repeated measures ANOVA tests
– year: 2017
  publication-title: Analysis of repeated measures data
– year: 2016
  publication-title: Power analysis
– volume: 60
  start-page: 549
  year: 2009
  end-page: 576
  article-title: Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world
  publication-title: Annual Review of Psychology
– volume: 56
  start-page: 947
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  end-page: 967
  article-title: A general permutation approach for analyzing repeated measures ANOVA and mixed-model designs
  publication-title: Statistical Papers
– volume: 40
  start-page: 318
  issue: 3-4
  year: 1953
  end-page: 335
  article-title: Non-normality on test on variance
  publication-title: Biometrika
– year: 2007
  publication-title: Experimental designs using ANOVA
– volume: 3
  start-page: 1
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  end-page: 7
  article-title: Modelización de diseños split-plot y estructuras de covarianza no estacionarias: un estudio de simulación [Modeling split-plot data and nonstationary covariance structures: A simulation study]
  publication-title: Escritos de Psicología - Psychological Writings
– year: 2013
  publication-title: Experimental design. Procedures for the behavioral sciences
– volume: 31
  start-page: 129
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 148
  article-title: Pruebas robustas para modelos ANOVA de dos factores con varianzas heterogéneas [Robust tests for two-way ANOVA models under heteroscedasticity]
  publication-title: Psicológica
– volume: 64
  start-page: 224
  issue: 2
  year: 2004
  end-page: 242
  article-title: The analysis of repeated measurements with mixed-model adjusted F tests
  publication-title: Educational and Psychological Measurement
– volume: 31
  start-page: 144
  issue: 2
  year: 1978
  end-page: 152
  article-title: Robustness?
  publication-title: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
– volume: 3
  issue: Article MP.2018.898
  year: 2019
  article-title: Differences of Type I error rates for ANOVA and Multilevel-Linear-Models using SAS and SPSS for repeated measures designs
  publication-title: Meta-Psychology
– volume: 18
  start-page: 293
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  end-page: 299
  article-title: Modelos de análisis para diseños multivariados de medidas repetidas [Multivariate repeated measures designs]
  publication-title: Psicothema
– year: 2001
  publication-title: The effects on Type I error rate and power of the single-factor repeated measures ANOVA F-test and selected alternatives under non-normality and non-uniformity
– volume: 30
  start-page: 364
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  end-page: 371
  article-title: Comparison of the procedures of Fleishman and Ramberg et al. for generating non-normal data in simulation studies
  publication-title: Anales de Psicología
– year: 2013
  publication-title: SAS® 9.4 guide to software Updates
– year: 2002
  publication-title: Statistical methods for the analysis of repeated measurements
– volume: 63
  start-page: 239
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  end-page: 246
  article-title: Greenhouse-Geisser adjustment and the ANOVA-type statistic: Cousins or twins?
  publication-title: The American Statistician
– volume: 54
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2001
  end-page: 2
  article-title: The analysis of repeated measures designs: A review
  publication-title: British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology
– volume: 8
  issue: Article 1841
  year: 2017
  article-title: Violation of the sphericity assumption and its effect on Type-I error rates in repeated measures ANOVA and multi-level linear models (MLM)
  publication-title: Frontiers in Psychology
– volume: 8
  issue: Article 1602
  year: 2017
  article-title: Non-normal distributions commonly used in health, education, and social sciences: A systematic review
  publication-title: Frontiers in Psychology
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1224
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1238
  article-title: Using the linear mixed model to analyze nonnormal data distributions in longitudinal designs
  publication-title: Behavior Research Methods
– volume: 59
  start-page: 78
  year: 2017
  end-page: 84
  article-title: Repeated-measure analyses: Which one? A survey of statistical models and recommendations for reporting
  publication-title: Neurotoxicology and Teratology
– year: 2003
  publication-title: Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures
– volume: 14
  start-page: 205
  issue: 3
  year: 1992
  end-page: 221
  article-title: The use of repeated measures analyses in developmental toxicology studies
  publication-title: Neurotoxicology and Teratology
– volume: 59
  start-page: 342
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  end-page: 346
  article-title: Crossover-repeated measures designs: Clarifying common misconceptions for a valuable human factors statistical technique
  publication-title: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
– volume: 48
  start-page: 1621
  issue: 4
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1630
  article-title: Sphericity estimation bias for repeated measures designs in simulation studies
  publication-title: Behavior Research Methods
– volume: 39
  start-page: 624
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  end-page: 664
  article-title: Analysis of Type I error rates of univariate and multivariate procedures in repeated measures designs
  publication-title: Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation
– year: 2013
  publication-title: Modeling intraindividual variability with repeated measures data: Methods and applications
– volume: 46
  start-page: 900
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  end-page: 937
  article-title: Comparison of modern methods for analyzing repeated measures data with missing data
  publication-title: Multivariate Behavioral Research
– year: 2016
  publication-title: Repeated measures design for empirical researchers
– volume: 6
  start-page: 147
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  end-page: 151
  article-title: Is it really robust? Reinvestigating the robustness of ANOVA against violations of the normal distribution assumption
  publication-title: Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
– volume: 127
  start-page: 569
  issue: 2
  year: 2018
  end-page: 575
  article-title: Repeated measures designs and analysis of longitudinal data: If at first you do not succeed - try, try again
  publication-title: Anesthesia and Analgesia
– volume: 43
  start-page: 521
  issue: 4
  year: 1978
  end-page: 532
  article-title: A method for simulating non-normal distributions
  publication-title: Psychometrika
– volume: 14
  issue: 8
  year: 2019
  article-title: Reporting and analysis of repeated measurements in preclinical animal experiments
  publication-title: PloS One
– year: 2022
  publication-title: Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing
– volume: 37
  start-page: 585
  issue: 5
  year: 2017
  end-page: 593
  article-title: Recommendations for analysis of repeated‐measures designs: Testing and correcting for sphericity and use of MANOVA and mixed model analysis
  publication-title: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics
– volume: 61
  start-page: 310
  issue: 3
  year: 2004
  end-page: 317
  article-title: Move over ANOVA: Progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the Archives of General Psychiatry
  publication-title: Archives of General Psychiatry
– volume: 16
  start-page: 509
  issue: 3
  year: 2004
  end-page: 518
  article-title: Alternativas de análisis estadístico en los diseños de medidas repetidas [Approaches to the statistical analysis of repeated measures designs]
  publication-title: Psicothema
– volume: 19
  start-page: 155
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  end-page: 161
  article-title: Models for the analysis of repeated continuous outcome measures in clinical trials: Analysis of repeated continuous measures
  publication-title: Respirology
– volume: 4
  start-page: 77
  issue: 2
  year: 2013
  end-page: 81
  article-title: Analysis of repeated measurement data in the clinical trials
  publication-title: Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine
– volume: 37
  start-page: 331
  issue: 3
  year: 2002
  end-page: 357
  article-title: A comparison of data analysis strategies for testing omnibus effects in higher-order repeated measures designs
  publication-title: Multivariate Behavioral Research,
– year: 1988
  publication-title: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
– volume: 43
  start-page: 264
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  end-page: 269
  article-title: Fixed effects analysis of repeated measures data
  publication-title: International Journal of Epidemiology
– volume: 49
  start-page: 275
  issue: 2
  year: 1996
  end-page: 298
  article-title: The analysis of repeated measurements: A quantitative research synthesis
  publication-title: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
– volume: 29
  start-page: 552
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  end-page: 557
  article-title: Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option?
  publication-title: Psicothema
– volume: 7
  start-page: 153
  issue: 1
  year: 2007
  end-page: 175
  article-title: Cómo elegir la mejor prueba estadística para analizar un diseño de medidas repetidas [How to choose the best statistical analysis for analyzing a repeated measures design]
  publication-title: International Journal of Clinical Psychology
– volume: 9
  year: 2018
  article-title: Current practices in data analysis procedures in psychology: What has changed?
  publication-title: Frontiers in Psychology
– volume: 9
  start-page: 78
  issue: 2
  year: 2013
  end-page: 84
  article-title: Skewness and kurtosis in real data samples
  publication-title: Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
– volume: 67
  start-page: 408
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  end-page: 429
  article-title: Should we rely on the Kenward-Roger approximation when using linear mixed models if the groups have different distributions?
  publication-title: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
– volume: 105
  start-page: 156
  issue: 1
  year: 1989
  end-page: 166
  article-title: The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 45
  start-page: 283
  issue: 2
  year: 1992
  end-page: 288
  article-title: Type I error and the number of iterations in Monte Carlo studies of robustness
  publication-title: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
– year: 2014
  publication-title: Repeated measurements and cross-over designs
– start-page: 193
  year: 2010
  end-page: 198
  article-title: Características y análisis de los diseños de medidas repetidas en la investigación en España en los últimos 10 años [Characteristics and analysis of repeated measures designs used in research in Spain over the last 10 years]
  publication-title: Actas del XI Congreso de Metodologías de las Ciencias Sociales y de la Salud
– volume: 68
  start-page: 350
  issue: 3
  year: 1998
  end-page: 386
  article-title: Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses
  publication-title: Review of Educational Research
SSID ssj0056372
Score 2.566407
Snippet Repeated measures designs are commonly used in health and social sciences research. Although there are other, more advanced, statistical analyses, the...
Background:Repeated measures designs are commonly used in health and social sciences research. Although there are other, more advanced, statistical analyses,...
Abstract Background: Repeated measures designs are commonly used in health and social sciences research. Although there are other, more advanced, statistical...
SourceID scielo
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 21
SubjectTerms Analysis of Variance
Between-subjects design
Computer Simulation
Humans
Psychology
Psychology, Clinical
Psychology, Developmental
Psychology, Experimental
Psychology, Multidisciplinary
Research Design
Sample Size
Variance analysis
Within-subjects design
Title Non-normal Data in Repeated Measures ANOVA: Impact on Type I Error and Power
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695847
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2777040477
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2769591677
http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1886-144X2023000100003&lng=en&tlng=en
Volume 1
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT9wwELZ4XLigQku7lK5cCakHlIITx056qQIEscAmUbq0yymKXye0u8By4N93JskuICSu8eShGc8339jxDCH7LDS-YoqDI4XW49I3XqxjNIgIleNW8uaQ2DAT59f8YhyOuwW3h-63ygUmNkBtphrXyA99KSVMOC7l79mdh12jcHe1a6GxStYBgiNIvtaP06woF1gciqBp34SFwTxgQmF7bEYGAT-cgRamTWVUyP_9n37svw5Nb_gmFhMFf7t9GYDOPpDNjjnSpDX1Flmxk22ysQSwp4_kKsNqG3k5TK7oaTJK6CCjZVqkCaATHaaAoKBummT53-QXHQyL5GRE84yOboqUDmhalnkJo6e0yP-l5SdyfZaOTs69rluCpznjcw-YlFFSKEgQeMTrQBoVW8esM84yZ2In7FENCV5kgCIop1ykZcCcjq3VFq4HO2RtMp3YL4QyfA6vj2oIZdwBpkW-roUWjhtXKxb3CFsoqtJdKXHsaHFbQUqByq1eK7cC5fbIwfKeWVtI413pvYX-q86pHqrnKdAj35fD4A64x1FP7PQRZUQcAuVFmc-t3ZavCwSMQTTukR-tIZ8f_YdFkYA0iI-xnTwSXwzkwe77n_GVbKB4uyKzR9bm94_2G3CUuep3E7EPLH1w2W8y_f-WWN8j
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6V7YFeEJTXQqFGAnFAoXXi2AkSQqGbakM3D4W0LKcQJ_ap2l3oVqh_it_IeJNsW1Xqrdf4kWie39iZGYC31G1sSSVDRXKVxYTdWH7tG4ZwV2qmBFslicUJHx-zb1N3ugH_-lwY81tlbxNXhrqZ1-aMfM8WQqDAMSG-LH5bpmuUuV3tW2i0YnGkLv5iyHb2ORohf9_Z9mFYHIytrquAVTPKlhYijkYKLhFIM49VjmikrzRVutGK6sbXXO1XGAh5DbpSqaX2auFQXftK1QqfO7jvPdhkDoYyA9j8GiZZ3tt-lzurdlGmEJmFyMtt03SE47C9BVJ9vqrEaqPf_Gj79nVXeAPfmuKlqN-nVx3e4UN40CFVErSi9Qg21GwbttYG8-IxTBJT3SPN42BCRkERkCgheZiFAVpDEodosZG9JEjSk-ATieIsOChImpDiZxaSiIR5nuY4OiJZ-iPMn8DxndDxKQxm85l6DoSafVi1X6HrZBptqGfXFa-5Zo2uJPWHQHtClXVXutx00DgtMYQxxC2vE7dE4g7hw3rNoi3ccevsnZ7-ZafEZ-WlyA3hzXoY1c_cqVQzNT83c7jvIsQ2c561fFu_zuE4ht5_CO9bRl5u_Z16Hsewi01N-3oDtA1wcF7c_hm7cH9cxJNyEiVHL2HLLG1Pg3ZgsPxzrl4hPlrK151QEvh113rwH3VbHDU
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEB6VVEK9IN4ECiwSiAMyydrrXRsJIdM4qmliWyYt4WS83t1TlQSaCvWv8euYje2UCqm3Xr0va57f7GMG4DX1lSupZKhIvnaYcJUT1qFlCPelYVqwzSOxacoPj9mXuT_fgT_dWxh7rbKziRtDrZa13SMfuEIIFDgmxMC01yLy0fjT6qdjK0jZk9aunEYjIkf64jeGb2cfkxHy-o3rjuPZwaHTVhhwakbZ2kH0oaTgEkE1C1jlCSVDbag2ymhqVGi4HlYYFAUK3ao00gS18KipQ61rjd89nPcW7AqMioY92P0cp3nR-QGfe5vSUTYpmYMozG-e7AjPY4MVcmC5ycrqog9974buVbf4H9a1iUxR10__dX7ju3CnRa0kasTsHuzoxX3Y2xrPiwcwSW2mj6yYRhMyimYRSVJSxHkcoWUk0xitN7KaRGl2En0gyTSPDmYkS8nsex6ThMRFkRXYOiJ59i0uHsLxjdDxEfQWy4V-AoTaeVg1rNCNMoP2NHDritfcMGUqScM-0I5QZd2mMbfVNE5LDGcsccurxC2RuH14tx2zapJ4XNt7v6N_2Sr0WXkpfn14tW1GVbTnK9VCL89tHx76CLdtn8cN37bLeRzbEAn04W3DyMupv9Ig4BiCsbktZW9BtwUR3tPrf-Ml3Eb5LydJevQM9uzIZmNoH3rrX-f6OUKltXzRyiSBHzetBn8B2rogag
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-normal+Data+in+Repeated+Measures+ANOVA%3A+Impact+on+Type+I+Error+and+Power&rft.jtitle=Psicothema&rft.au=Blanca%2C+Mar%C3%ADa+J&rft.au=Arnau%2C+Jaume&rft.au=Garc%C3%ADa-Castro%2C+F+J&rft.au=Alarc%C3%B3n%2C+Rafael&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.issn=1886-144X&rft.eissn=1886-144X&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft_id=info:doi/10.7334%2Fpsicothema2022.292&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0214-9915&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0214-9915&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0214-9915&client=summon