Non-normal Data in Repeated Measures ANOVA: Impact on Type I Error and Power

Repeated measures designs are commonly used in health and social sciences research. Although there are other, more advanced, statistical analyses, the F-statistic of repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) remains the most widely used procedure for analyzing differences in means. The impac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsicothema Vol. 1; no. 35; pp. 21 - 29
Main Authors Blanca, María, Arnau, Jaume, García-Castro, F., Alarcón, Rafael, Bono, Roser
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Spain Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos (PSICODOC) 01.01.2023
Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Repeated measures designs are commonly used in health and social sciences research. Although there are other, more advanced, statistical analyses, the F-statistic of repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) remains the most widely used procedure for analyzing differences in means. The impact of the violation of normality has been extensively studied for between-subjects ANOVA, but this is not the case for RM-ANOVA. Therefore, studies that extensively and systematically analyze the robustness of RM-ANOVA under the violation of normality are needed. This paper reports the results of two simulation studies aimed at analyzing the Type I error and power of RM-ANOVA when the normality assumption is violated but sphericity is fulfilled. Study 1 considered 20 distributions, both known and unknown, and we manipulated the number of repeated measures (3, 4, 6, and 8) and sample size (from 10 to 300). Study 2 involved unequal distributions in each repeated measure. The distributions analyzed represent slight, moderate, and severe deviation from normality. Overall, the results show that the Type I error and power of the F-statistic are not altered by the violation of normality. RM-ANOVA is generally robust to non-normality when the sphericity assumption is met.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0214-9915
1886-144X
1886-144X
DOI:10.7334/psicothema2022.292