Pulmonary arterial hypertension: an imaging review comparing MR pulmonary angiography and perfusion with multidetector CT angiography

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive disease that leads to substantial morbidity and eventual death. Pulmonary multidetector CT angiography (MDCTA), pulmonary MR angiography (MRA) and MR-derived pulmonary perfusion (MRPP) imaging are non-invasive imaging techniques for the differential diagn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of radiology Vol. 85; no. 1019; pp. 1446 - 1456
Main Authors JUNQUEIRA, F. P, LIMA, C. M. A. O, COUTINHO, A. C, PARENTE, D. B, BITTENCOURT, L. K, BESSA, L. G. P, DOMINGUES, R. C, MARCHIORI, E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London British Institute of Radiology 01.11.2012
The British Institute of Radiology
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive disease that leads to substantial morbidity and eventual death. Pulmonary multidetector CT angiography (MDCTA), pulmonary MR angiography (MRA) and MR-derived pulmonary perfusion (MRPP) imaging are non-invasive imaging techniques for the differential diagnosis of PH. MDCTA is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, one of the most common causes of PH. MRA and MRPP are promising techniques that do not require the use of ionising radiation or iodinated contrast material, and can be useful for patients for whom such material cannot be used. This review compares the imaging aspects of pulmonary MRA and 64-row MDCTA in patients with chronic thromboembolic or idiopathic PH.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0007-1285
1748-880X
DOI:10.1259/bjr/28150079