Theoretical and numerical analysis of void coalescence in porous ductile solids under arbitrary loadings

Micromechanics-based constitutive relations are developed to model plasticity in solids with relatively high levels of porosity. They are especially appropriate to model void coalescence in ductile materials. The model is obtained by limit analysis of a cylindrical cell containing a coaxial void of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of plasticity Vol. 91; pp. 160 - 181
Main Authors Torki, M.E., Tekog̃lu, C., Leblond, J.-B., Benzerga, A.A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2017
Elsevier BV
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Micromechanics-based constitutive relations are developed to model plasticity in solids with relatively high levels of porosity. They are especially appropriate to model void coalescence in ductile materials. The model is obtained by limit analysis of a cylindrical cell containing a coaxial void of finite height with plastic flow confined to the ligaments, and loaded under combined tension and shear. Previously obtained analytical estimates were not upper-bound preserving when shear was present and, in addition, were assessed against numerical results obtained for different cell geometries. Here, a rigorous upper-bound model is developed and its predictions are consistently compared with finite-element based estimates of limit loads on the same cylindrical unit cell exploiting quasi-periodic boundary conditions. The numerical results are used to guide a heuristic modification of the model in order to capture the behavior for extremely flat or extremely elongated voids. •Void coalescence by competing internal necking or shearing considered.•Analytical model developed based on homogenization and limit analysis theories.•Rigorous mathematical analysis conducted to obtain upper-bound yield criterion.•Cell model calculations performed using quasi-periodic boundary conditions.•Analytical and numerical yield loci compared.
ISSN:0749-6419
1879-2154
DOI:10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.02.011