Can't intubate, can't oxygenate? What is the preferred surgical strategy? A retrospective analysis

Cricothyrotomy (CTM) is currently recommended as the preferred method due to its ease, speed, and safety in life-threatening airway emergencies where standard tracheal intubation and mask ventilation fail. This retrospective study analyzed 33 cases of "can't intubate, can't oxygenate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnaesthesiology intensive therapy : official publication of the Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy Vol. 56; no. 1; pp. 37 - 46
Main Authors Nachshon, Akiva, Firman, Shimon, Batzofin, Baruch Mark, Miklosh, Bala, van Heerden, Peter Vernon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Poland Termedia Publishing House 01.01.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Cricothyrotomy (CTM) is currently recommended as the preferred method due to its ease, speed, and safety in life-threatening airway emergencies where standard tracheal intubation and mask ventilation fail. This retrospective study analyzed 33 cases of "can't intubate, can't oxygenate or ventilate" (CICOV): 12 of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) and 21 of CTM. The CTM group was younger (median age 44) and mainly consisted of trauma patients. The PDT group was more diverse and procedures were performed by anesthesia and critical care consultants. Initial success rates were 100% for PDT (12/12) and 86% for CTM (18/21), with one conversion from CTM to PDT. No perioperative complications occurred in the PDT group, while the CTM group experienced two cases of false tracts requiring re-do and three cases of bleeding. Immediate mortality within 24 hours was reported in 5/19 CTM patients and none in the PDT group. Successful liberation from mechanical ventilation at hospital discharge was achieved in 6/12 PDT patients and 11/21 CTM patients. Among the 21 CTM cases, all 16 survivors underwent subsequent tracheostomy. Tracheal decannulation occurred in 4/12 PDT patients and 10/21 CTM patients. Favorable immediate neurological outcomes (GCS ≥ 11T) were observed in 8/12 PDT patients and 8/21 CTM patients, while 3 PDT patients remained anesthetized until death and 7 CTM patients died within the first 72 hours without recovery attempts. In experienced hands, PDT could be a legitimate clinical option for the surgical airway in cases of CICOV. CTM may be more suitable for practitioners who encounter CICOV infrequently.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
These authors contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.
ISSN:1642-5758
1731-2531
DOI:10.5114/ait.2024.138437