Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT

ChatGPT and its variants that use generative artificial intelligence (AI) models have rapidly become a focal point in academic and media discussions about their potential benefits and drawbacks across various sectors of the economy, democracy, society, and environment. It remains unclear whether the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman resource management journal Vol. 33; no. 3; pp. 606 - 659
Main Authors Budhwar, Pawan, Chowdhury, Soumyadeb, Wood, Geoffrey, Aguinis, Herman, Bamber, Greg J., Beltran, Jose R., Boselie, Paul, Lee Cooke, Fang, Decker, Stephanie, DeNisi, Angelo, Dey, Prasanta Kumar, Guest, David, Knoblich, Andrew J., Malik, Ashish, Paauwe, Jaap, Papagiannidis, Savvas, Patel, Charmi, Pereira, Vijay, Ren, Shuang, Rogelberg, Steven, Saunders, Mark N. K., Tung, Rosalie L., Varma, Arup
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ChatGPT and its variants that use generative artificial intelligence (AI) models have rapidly become a focal point in academic and media discussions about their potential benefits and drawbacks across various sectors of the economy, democracy, society, and environment. It remains unclear whether these technologies result in job displacement or creation, or if they merely shift human labour by generating new, potentially trivial or practically irrelevant, information and decisions. According to the CEO of ChatGPT, the potential impact of this new family of AI technology could be as big as “the printing press”, with significant implications for employment, stakeholder relationships, business models, and academic research, and its full consequences are largely undiscovered and uncertain. The introduction of more advanced and potent generative AI tools in the AI market, following the launch of ChatGPT, has ramped up the “AI arms race”, creating continuing uncertainty for workers, expanding their business applications, while heightening risks related to well‐being, bias, misinformation, context insensitivity, privacy issues, ethical dilemmas, and security. Given these developments, this perspectives editorial offers a collection of perspectives and research pathways to extend HRM scholarship in the realm of generative AI. In doing so, the discussion synthesizes the literature on AI and generative AI, connecting it to various aspects of HRM processes, practices, relationships, and outcomes, thereby contributing to shaping the future of HRM research. Key points What is currently known? The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence models has swiftly prompted much academic and media discourse regarding their potential for disruption as well as their transformative power impacting multiple facets of the economy, society, and environment. Software tools like ChatGPT and other comparable ones utilizing generative AI models can produce incredibly human‐like responses to queries, yet, they can also be profoundly erroneous, raising significant ethical and moral issues, and their adoption by HRM practitioners. What this perspectives editorial adds? Provides a comprehensive summary of the advancements, constraints, and commercial applications of generative AI. Offers 11 perspectives that advance scholarship in HRM and present a collection of unexplored research opportunities for HRM scholars. The implications for practitioners Comprehending the possible strengths and weaknesses of implementing immersive technologies like ChatGPT and its variants in HRM strategy, practices, procedures, platforms, and productivity will aid organisations' leaders in critically evaluating its relevance, feasibility to implement, usefulness and potential impact to achieve organisationally valued outcomes. The lack of regulations heightens the risks and ethical dilemmas associated with the usage of generative AI models, which presents significant threats for organisations, scholarly research, and society at large.
Bibliography:The contributors and editors are listed in alphabetical order of their surnames. Each perspective is assigned to a section based on its relevance. The sections are organised to make the flow of the narrative logical, easy to navigate, insightful and compelling.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0954-5395
1748-8583
DOI:10.1111/1748-8583.12524