Sliding subject positions: knowledge and teacher educators

In England, adjustments to policy in teacher education have had implications for how subject knowledge is understood and for how job descriptions are defined. That is, the interface between teacher educator and subject knowledge representation has been changing. This paper reports on a wider study t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish educational research journal Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 492 - 507
Main Authors Brown, Tony, Rowley, Harriet, Smith, Kim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2016
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In England, adjustments to policy in teacher education have had implications for how subject knowledge is understood and for how job descriptions are defined. That is, the interface between teacher educator and subject knowledge representation has been changing. This paper reports on a wider study that considers the experience of university teacher educators adjusting to new academic and operational conditions. On the one hand, the teacher educators are confronted with their subject specialism being set according to new learning objectives and to new time and curriculum constraints. On the other hand, their professional identity is reshaped in response to structural changes to teacher education where earlier job definitions had been reconfigured or removed. The paper analyses resultant conceptions of subject knowledge and of teacher education emerging through this changing interface and how these conceptions are variously located across staffing arrangements. A Lacanian model of subjectivity provides a theoretical approach to depicting teacher educator and pre-service teacher identification with subject knowledge. The paper provides a theoretical account of how the teacher educator/trainee interface has been reshaped in line with the market-led terminology that governs current practices. Specifically, the analytical tools enable us to dismantle and restructure the prevalent symbolic order guiding current teacher practice and understanding, particularly our entrapment within specific discourses and identity constructs that shape our interactions with subject knowledge.
Bibliography:ArticleID:BERJ3203
ark:/67375/WNG-16F9WFBK-1
istex:CB5CFE747478821D8B228B192C3E1C6DE308C33F
The copyright line for this article was changed on 15 July 2016 after first online publication.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0141-1926
1469-3518
DOI:10.1002/berj.3203