Influence of reference states on Jupiter’s dynamo simulations

Jupiter’s magnetic field is thought to be generated in its deep metallic hydrogen region through dynamo action, yet the detailed dynamic process remains poorly understood. Numerical simulations have produced Jupiter‐like magnetic fields, albeit using different control parameters and reference state...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEarth and planetary physics Vol. 5; no. 4; pp. 305 - 313
Main Authors Yuan, LongHui, Lin, YuFeng, Jones, Chris A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Department of Earth and Space Sciences,Southern University of Science and Technology,Shenzhen 518055,China 01.07.2021
Department of Earth Sciences,The University of Hong Kong,Pokfulam Road,Hong Kong,China%Department of Earth and Space Sciences,Southern University of Science and Technology,Shenzhen 518055,China%School of Mathematics,University of Leeds,Leeds,LS29JT,United Kingdom
Science Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Jupiter’s magnetic field is thought to be generated in its deep metallic hydrogen region through dynamo action, yet the detailed dynamic process remains poorly understood. Numerical simulations have produced Jupiter‐like magnetic fields, albeit using different control parameters and reference state models. In this study, we investigate the influence of different reference state models, based on ab initio calculations and based on the polytropic equation of state. In doing so, we perform five anelastic convection dynamo simulations that can be divided into two groups. In each group, different reference states are used while other control parameters and conditions are set to be identical. We find the reference state model can be very influential for the simulations in which buoyancy force is dominant over the Lorentz force. In this regime, different dynamical outcomes can be attributed to the effective buoyancy force resulting from different reference states. For simulations in which the Lorentz force is dominant over the buoyancy force, however, dynamo actions tend to be insensitive to different reference state models. If Jupiter’s dynamo is in a strong field regime, i.e., the Lorentz force plays a dominant role, our numerical results suggest that Jupiter’s internal reference state, which remains poorly constrained, may play a minor role in the dynamo process of the planet. Key Points The influence of the reference state on dynamo actions depends on the regime of force balance. Dynamo actions tend to be insensitive to different reference state models when the Lorentz force is dominant over the buoyancy force. Uncertainties of Jupiter’s fully convective internal reference state may play a minor role in the dynamo process of the planet.
ISSN:2096-3955
2096-3955
DOI:10.26464/epp2021041