Regional and Fine Scale Variation of Holoepiphyte Community Structure in Central Amazonian White‐Sand Forests
Factors controlling holoepiphyte (plants which start and complete their life cycle on a phorophyte) distributions may be wide and variable. They are determined either by spatial processes, as evidenced by dispersal limitation and/or historical factors, environmental filters, such as microsite variat...
Saved in:
Published in | Biotropica Vol. 48; no. 1; pp. 70 - 80 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Association for Tropical Biology
2016
Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Factors controlling holoepiphyte (plants which start and complete their life cycle on a phorophyte) distributions may be wide and variable. They are determined either by spatial processes, as evidenced by dispersal limitation and/or historical factors, environmental filters, such as microsite variation within phorophytes, and/or biotic interactions. Disentangling the importance of these classes is particularly difficult in tropical forests where phorophyte alpha‐diversity is exceptionally high. We controlled for phorophyte specificity by studying the holoepiphytic communities of an emergent tree Aldina heterophylla (Fabaceae), known for its heavy epiphyte loads and dominance in Amazonian white‐sand habitats, in order to quantify the importance of tree zone and geographic distance on holoepiphytes at fine (100 m²) and regional (2500 km²) scales. At regional scales, tree zone explained nearly two‐thirds of the main compositional gradient, accounting for more than double that of site differences. No spatial effects were observed on holoepiphyte community structure at the fine scale as treelet communities were more dissimilar than by chance alone from their neighboring emergent phorophyte. These results suggest that microsite availability, as opposed to dispersal limitation, is the most important mechanism in structuring holoepiphyte communities of this insular forest type. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/btp.12300 MCT/CNPq - No. 017/2013 istex:B0508B4D8AF1194AF3A76F4F053C6772D1D8644E FIGURE S1. Map of the study area showing the three sites in Central Amazonia where emergent Aldina heterophylla phorophytes and treelets were sampled for holoepiphytes. FIGURE S2. Two dimensional axes of Principal Coordinate Analysis run on abundance data of 66 holoepiphyte species sampled on 35 Aldina heterophylla phorophytes. Figure S3. Regression of pairwise distances among emergente phorophytes and treelet communities against floristic dissimilarity. FIGURE S4. Frequency of Bray Curtis index calculated for the holoepiphyte composition of each pair of Aldina heterophylla and their surrounding treelets. FIGURE S5. Pairwise comparisions of phorophyte emergent and neighboring treelet communities with compositional distance, species richness, and number of individuals. ArticleID:BTP12300 ark:/67375/WNG-DN7SXSZ1-B ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0006-3606 1744-7429 |
DOI: | 10.1111/btp.12300 |