Implications of the pivot shift in the ACL-deficient knee

• Published in: Clinical orthopaedics and related research no. 436; p. 229
• Main Authors: Leitze, Zachary, Losee, Ron E, Jokl, Peter, Johnson, Thomas R, Feagin, John A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.07.2005
• Subjects: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Humans; Joint Instability - etiology; Joint Instability - physiopathology; Knee Injuries - physiopathology; Knee Injuries - surgery; Knee Joint - physiopathology; Knee Joint - surgery; Postoperative Complications; Range of Motion, Articular; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0009-921X
• DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000160026.14363.22

The Losee repair controls rotational subluxation of the lateral femoral condyle, or pivot shift, but does not reliably eliminate Lachman laxity. Despite this surgical limitation, many patients who were operated on continued to do high-demand activities at the last followup. We hypothesized that Lachman findings alone did not predict poor surgical outcome or progression to osteoarthritis. We report on 87 patients evaluated at an average of 9 years (range, 5-21 years) postoperatively. Prospectively collected examinations and radiographic, subjective, and objective outcome measures were recorded and statistically evaluated. The presence of a postoperative pivot shift or residual varus laxity correlated with poor patient subjective evaluations and poor scoring outcomes. Lachman laxity with an absent pivot shift had no correlation with the outcome measures or onset of radiographic progression to osteoarthritis. Meniscectomy, additional knee surgery, increased valgus or varus laxity, and time from injury until the final radiograph positively correlated with the onset of osteoarthritis. Elimination of the pivot shift was necessary to achieve successful relief of symptoms and functional outcome. In the absence of a pivot shift, Lachman laxity was not solely predictive of poor outcomes. Prognostic study, Level II-1 (retrospective study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.