Influence of natural rainfall variability on the evaluation of artificial precipitation enhancement

Evaluating cloud seeding effects is one of the most critical issues in artificial precipitation enhancement experiments. However the evaluation is not straightforward because there is natural rainfall variability, which subjects the atmosphere to spatiotem- poral instabilities. The aim of this study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScience China. Earth sciences Vol. 58; no. 6; pp. 906 - 914
Main Authors Wu, XiangHua, Niu, ShengJie, Jin, DeZhen, Sun, HaiYan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Beijing Science China Press 01.06.2015
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Evaluating cloud seeding effects is one of the most critical issues in artificial precipitation enhancement experiments. However the evaluation is not straightforward because there is natural rainfall variability, which subjects the atmosphere to spatiotem- poral instabilities. The aim of this study is to analyze natural rainfall variability using the modern statistical simulation method, "bootstrap", to analyze its influence on the evaluation of seeding activities and to take proper measures to control the influence. The study is based on the 1997-2007 airborne seeding macro records and the daily precipitation data in Jilin Province. The in- fluence of natural rainfall variability can be reduced through three approaches: the increase of the supposed "seeded" sample size N, the rejection of outliers, and the selection of similar control units. A larger N leads to smaller calculated precipitation variability and detectable lower limits of seeding effects. When N is near 470 and the seeding effect is between 20% and 30%, the confidence level reaches 90%. For a single seeding operation, the case deletion model that rejects strong influence points and selects similar control units is established to control the influence of natural precipitation variability, which obviously im- proves the evaluation of artificial precipitation enhancement. The results demonstrate that the relative seeding effect in Jilin Province is concentrated mainly in the range of 0 to 30%, with an average of 11.95%, and has no significant linear relationship with the actual precipitation amount. However, the fluctuation amplitude of the relative effect decreases as the precipitation amount rises.
Bibliography:seeding effect, natural rainfall variability, bootstrap, case deletion model, detectable lower limit
Evaluating cloud seeding effects is one of the most critical issues in artificial precipitation enhancement experiments. However the evaluation is not straightforward because there is natural rainfall variability, which subjects the atmosphere to spatiotem- poral instabilities. The aim of this study is to analyze natural rainfall variability using the modern statistical simulation method, "bootstrap", to analyze its influence on the evaluation of seeding activities and to take proper measures to control the influence. The study is based on the 1997-2007 airborne seeding macro records and the daily precipitation data in Jilin Province. The in- fluence of natural rainfall variability can be reduced through three approaches: the increase of the supposed "seeded" sample size N, the rejection of outliers, and the selection of similar control units. A larger N leads to smaller calculated precipitation variability and detectable lower limits of seeding effects. When N is near 470 and the seeding effect is between 20% and 30%, the confidence level reaches 90%. For a single seeding operation, the case deletion model that rejects strong influence points and selects similar control units is established to control the influence of natural precipitation variability, which obviously im- proves the evaluation of artificial precipitation enhancement. The results demonstrate that the relative seeding effect in Jilin Province is concentrated mainly in the range of 0 to 30%, with an average of 11.95%, and has no significant linear relationship with the actual precipitation amount. However, the fluctuation amplitude of the relative effect decreases as the precipitation amount rises.
11-5843/P
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:1674-7313
1869-1897
DOI:10.1007/s11430-015-5055-0