Prognostication of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with Deauville score of 3 or 4 at end-of-treatment PET evaluation: a comparison of the Deauville 5-point scale and the ΔSUVmax method

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is treated with anti-CD 20 and multi-drug chemotherapy for cure. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans are performed at end of treatment (EOT) to assess response. EOT Deauville scores (DS) are equivocal for treatment response in some situations, requiring physicians...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLeukemia & lymphoma Vol. 63; no. 1; pp. 256 - 259
Main Authors Ng, David Z., Lee, Chuan Yaw, Lam, Winnie W., Tong, Aaron K., Tan, Sze Huey, Khoo, Lay Poh, Tan, Ya Hwee, Chiang, Jianbang, Chang, Esther W., Chan, Jason Y., Poon, Eileen Y., Somasundaram, Nagavalli, Farid H. Rashid, Mohamed, Tao, Miriam, Lim, Soon Thye, Yang, Valerie S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Taylor & Francis 02.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is treated with anti-CD 20 and multi-drug chemotherapy for cure. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans are performed at end of treatment (EOT) to assess response. EOT Deauville scores (DS) are equivocal for treatment response in some situations, requiring physicians to determine the need for further investigations or treatment. Studies have suggested the delta maximum standardised uptake value (ΔSUVmax) to be superior to DS for assessment of metabolic response at interim PET, although its use at EOT PET, especially in cases of equivocal response, has yet to be established. We investigated whether ΔSUVmax could better discriminate prognosis than DS 3 or 4 at EOT. ΔSUVmax did not outperform DS. Combination of DS 3 and International Prognostic Index (IPI) <3 selects for patients with extremely low risk of disease progression (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.62, p 0.018) compared to DS 4 and IPI ≥3.
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 63
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Correspondence-3
ISSN:1042-8194
1029-2403
DOI:10.1080/10428194.2021.1992624