Clinical Profile and Prognosis of Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Who Met the Obesity-Related Eligibility for Subcutaneous Semaglutide ― Findings From the CURE-HF Registry

Background: Obesity is well-established risk factor of heart failure (HF); however, “obesity paradox” has been described in symptomatic HF patients. The STEP-HFpEF study suggested that once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide might improve outcomes in patients with obesity-related HF. We explored the pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation Reports Vol. 7; no. 6; pp. 463 - 472
Main Authors Nishikawa, Ken, Minamisawa, Masatoshi, Yoshie, Koji, Suzuki, Sho, Tanaka, Kiu, Okuma, Yukari, Kimura, Kazuhiro, Ueki, Yasushi, Oguchi, Yasutaka, Kato, Tamon, Saigusa, Tatsuya, Ebisawa, Soichiro, Okada, Ayako, Motoki, Hirohiko, Kuwahara, Koichiro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Japanese Circulation Society 10.06.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Obesity is well-established risk factor of heart failure (HF); however, “obesity paradox” has been described in symptomatic HF patients. The STEP-HFpEF study suggested that once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide might improve outcomes in patients with obesity-related HF. We explored the prevalence of obesity-related eligibility for semaglutide treatment among patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and evaluated their prognoses.Methods and Results: We analyzed data from 1,017 ADHF patients (median, 81 years; 44.2% female) enrolled in the CURE-HF registry. We assessed prevalence of obesity-related eligibility for semaglutide administration and examined the association between this eligibility and all-cause death over a median follow-up of 2.7 years. There were 73 patients (7.2%) who were semaglutide-eligible and they had a higher proportion of diabetes mellitus than patients who were semaglutide non-eligible (64.4% vs. 26.4%, P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that semaglutide-eligible patients had a significantly lower all-cause mortality rate than non-eligible patients (log-rank P=0.005). After adjustment for demographic characteristics, there was no significant difference in mortality rate between the 2 groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34–1.17, P=0.14). In the propensity score-matched cohort, we did not observe a significant difference in mortality rate (log-rank, P=0.79).Conclusions: Almost 7.2% of the ADHF patients were semaglutide-eligible. Our findings did not affirm the “obesity paradox” in semaglutide-eligible HF patients after adjusting for demographic factors.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Masatoshi Minamisawa, MD, PhD
ISSN:2434-0790
2434-0790
DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0041