Evaluation of systems for timing of fungicide sprays for control of postbloom fruit drop of citrus in Brazil

• Published in: Plant disease Vol. 88; no. 7; pp. 731 - 735
• Main Authors: Peres, N.A.R, Souza, N.L, Furtado, E.L, Timmer, L.W
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: St. Paul, MN American Phytopathological Society 01.07.2004
• Subjects: application timing; Biological and medical sciences; chemical control; Citrus; Colletotrichum acutatum; disease control; fruit drop; fruit trees; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; fungal diseases of plants; fungicides; pesticide application; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection; plant pathogenic fungi; postbloom fruit drop; Brazil; South America; America; Citrus; Plant pathology; Microbiology; Plant pathogen; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Pesticides; Rutaceae; Spermatophyta; Fungicide
• ISSN: 0191-2917; 1943-7692
• DOI: 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.7.731

Postbloom fruit drop (PFD) of citrus, caused by Colletotrichum acutatum, infects petals of citrus flowers and produces orange-brown lesions that induce the abscission of young fruitlets and the retention of calyces. Proper timing of fungicide applications is essential for good disease control. Different systems for timing of fungicide applications for control of PFD in a major citrus-growing region in southern São Paulo state in Brazil were evaluated from 1999 to 2002. The following programs were compared to an unsprayed control using counts of diseased flowers, persistent calyces, or fruit: (i) a phenology-based program currently recommended in Brazil with one application at early and another at peak bloom; (ii) the Florida PFD model; (iii) the post-bloom fruit drop-fungicide application decision system (PFD-FAD), a new computer-assisted decision method; and (iv) grower's choice. In 1999, no disease developed, sprays applied with the phenology-based program had no effect, and the Florida PFD model saved two sprays compared with the phenology-based program. In 2000, PFD was moderate and the phenology-based and grower's choice treatments had a significantly lower number of persistent calyces and higher fruit numbers than the control, but no differences were found between those treatments and the PFD model. In 2001, PFD was severe with considerable yield loss. The PFD model, the phenology-based program, and the grower's choice reduced flower blight and the number of persistent calyces, and improved fruit yields with two to three applications, but the PFD-FAD achieved comparable yields with only one spray. In 2002, the disease was mild, with no yield loss, and the Florida PFD model and the PFD-FAD saved one spray compared with the other systems. The PFD model and the PFD-FAD were equally effective for timing fungicide applications to control PFD in Brazil. Scouting of trees is simpler with PFD-FAD; therefore, this system is recommended and should eliminate unnecessary sprays and reduce costs for growers.