Modeling gender counter-stereotypic group behavior: a brief video intervention reduces participation gender gaps on STEM teams

In STEM project group teams, men speak for more time (Meadows and Sekaquaptewa, in: Proceedings of ASEE annual conference, 2011 ) and engage in more active technical participation than women, which can have negative long-term consequences (Cheryan et al. in Psychol Bull 143:1–35, 2017 ; Lord et al....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocial psychology of education Vol. 22; no. 3; pp. 557 - 577
Main Authors Lewis, Neil A., Sekaquaptewa, Denise, Meadows, Lorelle A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.07.2019
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Education
Engineering Education
Female-male relations
Females
Gender
Gender Differences
Group Behavior
Intervention
Males
Modeling (Psychology)
Personality and Social Psychology
Sex Stereotypes
Sociology of Education
STEM Education
Student Participation
Teamwork
Verbal Communication
Video Technology
Women
Teaching intervention
Behavior change
Group dynamics
Stereotypes
STEM
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:In STEM project group teams, men speak for more time (Meadows and Sekaquaptewa, in: Proceedings of ASEE annual conference, 2011 ) and engage in more active technical participation than women, which can have negative long-term consequences (Cheryan et al. in Psychol Bull 143:1–35, 2017 ; Lord et al. in IEEE Trans Educ 54(4):610–618, 2011 ). In the current study, we tested the effects of a brief counter-stereotypic video intervention on gender gaps in verbal participation on mixed-gender teams of STEM students (N = 143). Participants viewed either a control video of an engineering student team behaving in a gender stereotype-consistent way (men talked longer and presented more technical information than women) in a group presentation and group interview, or a gender counter-stereotypic intervention version (roles reversed) prior to engaging in their own STEM group project task in a laboratory setting. Analysis of video footage of the groups showed that men spoke longer than women in the control condition, but men and women spoke for equal time in the intervention condition. This result was corroborated by participants’ self-report of their verbal participation in their group.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ISSN:1381-2890
1573-1928
DOI:10.1007/s11218-019-09489-3