A Multi-institutional Survey of the Effectiveness of Chemotherapy Combined with Radiotherapy for Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

• Published in: Japanese journal of clinical oncology Vol. 34; no. 10; pp. 569 - 583
• Main Authors: Kawashima, Mitsuhiko, Fuwa, Nobukazu, Myojin, Miyako, Nakamura, Katsumasa, Toita, Takafumi, Saijo, Shigeru, Hayashi, Nobuyuki, Ohnishi, Hiroshi, Shikama, Naoto, Kano, Makoto, Yamamoto, Michinori
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Oxford University Press 01.10.2004; Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use; chemotherapy; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Data Collection; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fluorouracil - administration & dosage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; nasopharyngeal cancer; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms - drug therapy; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms - mortality; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms - radiotherapy; Platinum - administration & dosage; radiotherapy; Radiotherapy Dosage; survey; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0368-2811; 1465-3621; 1465-3621
• DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyh111

Background: Previous randomized trials have shown a survival advantage of concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced nasopharyngeal cancer. Applicability of these data to a Japanese population is an important issue which remains to be solved. Methods: A retrospective survey of treatment of patients with nasopharyngeal cancer in 17 institutions in Japan was done with special reference to the relationship between the type of chemotherapy and survival outcome. Chemotherapy used was classified according to: (i) whether ≥2 courses of platinum plus 5-fluorouracil (FP) was given; or (ii) whether platinum was administered concurrently with radiotherapy (RT). This resulted in three groups being produced consisting of (i)/(ii) = YES/YES, other miscellaneous (MISC) and RT alone. Results: Of 333 evaluable replies, 67 patients (20%) corresponded to the YES/YES, 192 (58%) to the MISC and 74 (22%) to the RT alone group. The YES/YES group achieved a better overall survival than RT alone for patients with intermediate stage (T3N0 or T1–3N1, 81.9 versus 60.7% at 5 years, P = 0.042) and advanced stage (T4 or N2/3, 56.6 versus 31.5%, P = 0.017) disease. The MISC group achieved an almost identical survival rate to that in the YES/YES group for patients with intermediate stage disease (81.9% at 5 years, P = 0.968), whereas it was not significantly different from that of the RT alone group for patients with advanced stage disease (44.0%, P = 0.261). Conclusion: The results of this survey mirrored the data from previous randomized trials for patients with intermediate and advanced stage nasopharyngeal cancer in Japan. However, confirmatory prospective trials are required to test the efficacy of less toxic approaches for patients with intermediate stage disease.