Light Therapy for Seasonal Affective Disorder the Effects of Timing
Sixty-eight patients with seasonal affective disorder participated in a 10,000-lux light treatment study in which two questions were addressed: do response rates differ when the light is applied at different times of the day and does short-term rank ordering of morning and evening light influence re...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of psychiatry Vol. 166; no. 5; pp. 607 - 612 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Cambridge, UK
Cambridge University Press
01.05.1995
RCP |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Sixty-eight patients with seasonal affective disorder participated in a 10,000-lux light treatment study in which two questions were addressed: do response rates differ when the light is applied at different times of the day and does short-term rank ordering of morning and evening light influence response rates?
Three groups of patients received a 4-day light treatment: (I) in the morning (8.00-8.30 a.m., n = 14), (II) in the afternoon (1.00-1.30 p.m., n = 15) or (III) in the evening (8.00-8.30 p.m., n = 12). Two additional groups of patients received two days of morning light treatment followed by two days of evening light (IV, n = 13) or vice versa (V, n = 14).
Response rates for groups I, II and III were 69, 57 and 80% respectively, with no significant differences between them. Response rates for groups IV and V were 67 and 50% respectively; this difference was not significant and these percentages did not differ significantly from those of groups I and III.
The results indicate that the timing of light treatment is not critical and that short-term rank ordering of morning and evening light does not influence therapeutic outcome. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-News-3 |
ISSN: | 0007-1250 1472-1465 |
DOI: | 10.1192/bjp.166.5.607 |