Ru nanoparticles supported graphene oxide catalyst for hydrogenation of bio-based levulinic acid to cyclic ethers

• Published in: Catalysis today Vol. 265; pp. 174 - 183
• Main Authors: Upare, Pravin P., Lee, Maeum, Lee, Su-Kyung, Yoon, Ji Woong, Bae, Jongyoon, Hwang, Dong Won, Lee, U-Hwang, Chang, Jong-San, Hwang, Young Kyu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.05.2016
• Subjects: GVL; Hydrogenation; Levulinic acid; Ru/graphene oxide; Ru/graphene oxide; Levulinic acid; GVL; Hydrogenation
• ISSN: 0920-5861; 1873-4308
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.09.042

•We find that Ru/GO catalyst produce 92% of cyclic ethers from LA and GVL hydrogenation under vapor phase conditions.•Enhancement of catalytic activity of Ru/GO than Ru/carbon is attributed to well dispersion of metallic Ru nanoparticle and presence of oxy-functional group on GO.•Ru/GO provides it stability for long term without any activity loss. Ruthenium nanoparticles supported on graphene oxide (GO) catalysts have been evaluated for bio-based levulinic acid (LA) hydrogenation to produce vapor-phase cyclic ethers in a fixed-bed reactor. It was found that using the GO supported Ru nanoparticles (Ru/GO) produced additional hydrogenation products – cyclic ethers (54%) and γ-valerolactone (GVL; 41%), while Ru on carbon (Ru/C) catalysts gave only GVL with 100% LA conversion. To improve the yield of cyclic ethers, an additional two-step hydrogenation of LA via GVL was successfully carried out. This provided GVL as a second feedstock from which the Ru/GO catalyst could produce cyclic ethers such as methyltetrahydrofuran (MTHF) and tetrahydrofuran (THF). Ru on GO catalysts showed a 92% selectivity of predominantly cyclic ethers, including a 77% selectivity of MTHF through two steps process. Such a remarkable enhancement in activity and selectivity of LA hydrogenation over Ru/GO can be attributed to the well-dispersion of Ru nanoparticles, as well as favorable interaction with GO in the presence of oxy-functional groups of GO. In order to evaluate the active sites on the catalyst, they were characterized using different characterization techniques such as Raman, XRD, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), temperature-programmed reduction (TPR), temperature-programmed desorption of NH3 (TPD), electron microscopy (TEM and SEM) and H2-chemisorption and N2 adsorption.